From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: optimize napi_threaded_poll() vs RPS/RFS
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:09:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d84e9f5056c4945cb4cfcc68c89986d3094b95b7.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421094357.1693410-6-edumazet@google.com>
Hello,
thank you for the extremely fast turnaround!
On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 09:43 +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> We use napi_threaded_poll() in order to reduce our softirq dependency.
>
> We can add a followup of 821eba962d95 ("net: optimize napi_schedule_rps()")
> to further remove the need of firing NET_RX_SOFTIRQ whenever
> RPS/RFS are used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 +++
> net/core/dev.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index a6a3e9457d6cbc9fcbbde96b43b4b21878495403..08fbd4622ccf731daaee34ad99773d6dc2e82fa6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -3194,7 +3194,10 @@ struct softnet_data {
> #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> struct softnet_data *rps_ipi_list;
> #endif
> +
> bool in_net_rx_action;
> + bool in_napi_threaded_poll;
If I'm correct only one of the above 2 flags can be set to true at any
give time. I'm wondering if could use a single flag (possibly with a
rename - say 'in_napi_polling')?
Otherwise LGTM, many thanks!
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-21 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 9:43 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: give napi_threaded_poll() some love Eric Dumazet
2023-04-21 9:43 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: add debugging checks in skb_attempt_defer_free() Eric Dumazet
2023-04-21 9:43 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: do not provide hard irq safety for sd->defer_lock Eric Dumazet
2023-04-21 9:43 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: move skb_defer_free_flush() up Eric Dumazet
2023-04-21 9:43 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: make napi_threaded_poll() aware of sd->defer_list Eric Dumazet
2023-04-21 9:43 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: optimize napi_threaded_poll() vs RPS/RFS Eric Dumazet
2023-04-21 13:09 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2023-04-21 14:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-21 14:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-04-21 15:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-04-23 12:50 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: give napi_threaded_poll() some love patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d84e9f5056c4945cb4cfcc68c89986d3094b95b7.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox