Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Louis Peens <louis.peens@corigine.com>
To: Marcelo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
Cc: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	"ovs-dev@openvswitch.org" <ovs-dev@openvswitch.org>,
	Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@corigine.com>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] tc-conntrack: inconsistent behaviour with icmpv6
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:03:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8b98109-7cea-8f85-c54c-11ce78aa4bc1@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YF4SnCaDTfKcVImr@horizon.localdomain>



On 2021/03/26 18:58, Marcelo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Louis Peens wrote:
>> So in the end I think there are two problems - the on you identified with only checking
>> the mask in commit 1bcc51ac0731. And then the second bigger one is that the behaviour
>> differs depending on whether the recirc upcall is after the a rule installed in tc
>> or a rule installed in ovs, as Marcelo mentioned.
> 
> Hi Louis,
> 
> Not sure if you noticed but both fixes landed in upstream kernel
> already.
> That's basically:
> afa536d8405a ("net/sched: cls_flower: fix only mask bit check in the
> validate_ct_state")
> d29334c15d33 ("net/sched: act_api: fix miss set post_ct for ovs after
> do conntrack in act_ct")
> 
> If testing again, it's probably better if you use the latest one.
Hi Marcelo

Thanks for the ping, I saw the mask fix, but I did indeed miss the
post_ct fix. Looking at the change it looks like it would address
the issue that we saw. Will test it out and report back in case
something is still wrong, but hopefully this is the end of the
chain. Thanks for the help everyone.

Regards
Louis

> 
> Thanks,
> Marcelo
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-10  7:51 [ovs-dev] tc-conntrack: inconsistent behaviour with icmpv6 Louis Peens
2021-03-10 11:06 ` Ilya Maximets
2021-03-12 22:06   ` Marcelo Leitner
     [not found]     ` <58820355-7337-d51b-32dd-be944600832d@corigine.com>
2021-03-15 15:50       ` Louis Peens
2021-03-16  7:00       ` wenxu
2021-03-16 15:12         ` Louis Peens
2021-03-26 16:58           ` Marcelo Leitner
2021-03-26 18:03             ` Louis Peens [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e8b98109-7cea-8f85-c54c-11ce78aa4bc1@corigine.com \
    --to=louis.peens@corigine.com \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ovs-dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
    --cc=wenxu@ucloud.cn \
    --cc=yinjun.zhang@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox