* [PATCH] net: leave O_NONBLOCK to the sendmsg and recvmsg syscalls
@ 2026-11-06 23:19 Jens Axboe
2026-11-06 23:36 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2026-11-06 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Eric Dumazet, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn,
Jakub Kicinski
____sys_sendmsg() and ____sys_recvmsg() turn O_NONBLOCK on the socket
into MSG_DONTWAIT. That is right for the system calls, but io_uring uses
__sys_sendmsg_sock() and __sys_recvmsg_sock() for a blocking attempt
from io-wq as well, after the non-blocking attempts with MSG_DONTWAIT
have failed. On an O_NONBLOCK socket that attempt can't block either and
the request completes with -EAGAIN, unlike IORING_OP_SEND and RECV,
which call sock_sendmsg() and sock_recvmsg() directly and don't look at
O_NONBLOCK at all.
Move the O_NONBLOCK handling to ___sys_sendmsg() and ___sys_recvmsg(),
which the sendmsg, sendmmsg, recvmsg and recvmmsg system calls go
through. The io_uring helpers then pass the flags the caller asked for.
Reported-by: Luk?? Lalinsk? <lukas@lalinsky.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 2e3b5737c481..08658a9b8065 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/n
@@ -2697,8 +2697,6 @@ static int ____sys_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg_sys,
flags &= ~MSG_INTERNAL_SENDMSG_FLAGS;
msg_sys->msg_flags = flags;
- if (sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
- msg_sys->msg_flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
/*
* If this is sendmmsg() and current destination address is same as
* previously succeeded address, omit asking LSM's decision.
@@ -2762,6 +2760,9 @@ static int ___sys_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct user_msghdr __user *msg,
msg_sys->msg_name = &address;
+ if (sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
+ flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
+
err = sendmsg_copy_msghdr(msg_sys, msg, flags, &iov);
if (err < 0)
return err;
@@ -2926,9 +2927,6 @@ static int ____sys_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg_sys,
/* We assume all kernel code knows the size of sockaddr_storage */
msg_sys->msg_namelen = 0;
- if (sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
- flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
-
if (unlikely(nosec))
err = sock_recvmsg_nosec(sock, msg_sys, flags);
else
@@ -2970,6 +2968,9 @@ static int ___sys_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct user_msghdr __user *msg,
struct sockaddr __user *uaddr;
ssize_t err;
+ if (sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
+ flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
+
err = recvmsg_copy_msghdr(msg_sys, msg, flags, &uaddr, &iov);
if (err < 0)
return err;
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: leave O_NONBLOCK to the sendmsg and recvmsg syscalls
2026-11-06 23:19 [PATCH] net: leave O_NONBLOCK to the sendmsg and recvmsg syscalls Jens Axboe
@ 2026-11-06 23:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-11-06 23:47 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2026-11-06 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe
Cc: netdev, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn,
Jakub Kicinski
Le sam. 7 nov. 2026 à 00:19, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> a écrit :
>
> ____sys_sendmsg() and ____sys_recvmsg() turn O_NONBLOCK on the socket
> into MSG_DONTWAIT. That is right for the system calls, but io_uring uses
> __sys_sendmsg_sock() and __sys_recvmsg_sock() for a blocking attempt
> from io-wq as well, after the non-blocking attempts with MSG_DONTWAIT
> have failed. On an O_NONBLOCK socket that attempt can't block either and
> the request completes with -EAGAIN, unlike IORING_OP_SEND and RECV,
> which call sock_sendmsg() and sock_recvmsg() directly and don't look at
> O_NONBLOCK at all.
Makes sense. The socket.c side looks fine to me: all syscall paths
(sendmsg, sendmmsg, recvmsg, recvmmsg, compat) go through ___sys_sendmsg()
or ___sys_recvmsg(), and the copy_msghdr helpers only care about
MSG_CMSG_COMPAT, so setting MSG_DONTWAIT earlier is harmless.
Fixes: tags? And please tag the subject [PATCH net] if this is
meant as a fix.
Fixes: 0fa03c624d8f ("io_uring: add support for sendmsg()")
Fixes: aa1fa28fc73e ("io_uring: add support for recvmsg()")
>
> Move the O_NONBLOCK handling to ___sys_sendmsg() and ___sys_recvmsg(),
> which the sendmsg, sendmmsg, recvmsg and recvmmsg system calls go
> through. The io_uring helpers then pass the flags the caller asked for.
>
> Reported-by: Luk?? Lalinsk? <lukas@lalinsky.com>
The name lost its accents (Lukáš Lalinský). A Closes: or Link: to the
report would be nice too.
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index 2e3b5737c481..08658a9b8065 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/n
This header got truncated, so the patch does not apply as posted.
> @@ -2697,8 +2697,6 @@ static int ____sys_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg_sys,
> flags &= ~MSG_INTERNAL_SENDMSG_FLAGS;
> msg_sys->msg_flags = flags;
>
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] net: leave O_NONBLOCK to the sendmsg and recvmsg syscalls
2026-11-06 23:36 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2026-11-06 23:47 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2026-11-06 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: netdev, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn,
Jakub Kicinski
On 11/6/26 4:36 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le sam. 7 nov. 2026 ? 00:19, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> a ?crit :
>>
>> ____sys_sendmsg() and ____sys_recvmsg() turn O_NONBLOCK on the socket
>> into MSG_DONTWAIT. That is right for the system calls, but io_uring uses
>> __sys_sendmsg_sock() and __sys_recvmsg_sock() for a blocking attempt
>> from io-wq as well, after the non-blocking attempts with MSG_DONTWAIT
>> have failed. On an O_NONBLOCK socket that attempt can't block either and
>> the request completes with -EAGAIN, unlike IORING_OP_SEND and RECV,
>> which call sock_sendmsg() and sock_recvmsg() directly and don't look at
>> O_NONBLOCK at all.
>
> Makes sense. The socket.c side looks fine to me: all syscall paths
> (sendmsg, sendmmsg, recvmsg, recvmmsg, compat) go through ___sys_sendmsg()
> or ___sys_recvmsg(), and the copy_msghdr helpers only care about
> MSG_CMSG_COMPAT, so setting MSG_DONTWAIT earlier is harmless.
Thanks for checking!
> Fixes: tags? And please tag the subject [PATCH net] if this is
> meant as a fix.
>
> Fixes: 0fa03c624d8f ("io_uring: add support for sendmsg()")
> Fixes: aa1fa28fc73e ("io_uring: add support for recvmsg()")
Good point, I'll add the fixes tags and the subject.
>> Move the O_NONBLOCK handling to ___sys_sendmsg() and ___sys_recvmsg(),
>> which the sendmsg, sendmmsg, recvmsg and recvmmsg system calls go
>> through. The io_uring helpers then pass the flags the caller asked for.
>>
>> Reported-by: Luk?? Lalinsk? <lukas@lalinsky.com>
>
> The name lost its accents (Luk?? Lalinsk?). A Closes: or Link: to the
> report would be nice too.
Man, not a lot went right in this posting... But yes, it lost it. I'll
add a link too.
>> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
>> index 2e3b5737c481..08658a9b8065 100644
>> --- a/net/socket.c
>> +++ b/n
>
> This header got truncated, so the patch does not apply as posted.
I'll send a v2 :)
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-06 23:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-06 23:19 [PATCH] net: leave O_NONBLOCK to the sendmsg and recvmsg syscalls Jens Axboe
2026-11-06 23:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-11-06 23:47 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox