Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Bui Duc Phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	davem@davemloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 04:57:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f999c24e-7009-45aa-bf09-658d368af8eb@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAABR9nGr+cYmGsj2eXHCRRvN7TkcsT_bTS2LkA537Z2Ns0VORQ@mail.gmail.com>

> What about -EPROBE_DEFER? Do you also want to ignore it and not
> give the driver a chance to probe again?

Please do some git research. How long has the code been this way?

If -EPROBE_DEFER was a problem, why has nobody reported it?

    Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20 11:14 [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling phucduc.bui
2026-08-20 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: bcmasp: Use platform_get_irq() for IRQ lookup phucduc.bui
2026-08-20 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: bcmasp: Propagate WoL IRQ errors from probe phucduc.bui
2026-08-20 11:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: systemport: Propagate IRQ lookup errors phucduc.bui
2026-08-20 11:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: bcmgenet: Propagate WoL IRQ errors phucduc.bui
2026-08-20 13:30 ` [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling Paolo Abeni
2026-08-20 16:45   ` Florian Fainelli
2026-08-20 18:42     ` Justin Chen
2026-08-21  2:38       ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-21  2:57         ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2026-08-21  4:49           ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-21  2:06   ` Bui Duc Phuc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f999c24e-7009-45aa-bf09-658d368af8eb@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=justin.chen@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opendmb@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox