From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] tools: ynl-gen: lift type requirement for attribute subsets
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:15:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffeeac4ea45e5a087aab44ac137a945111d941e7.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919142139.1167653-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 16:21 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>
> In case an attribute is used in a subset, the type has to be currently
> specified. As the attribute is already defined in the original set, this
> is a redundant information in yaml file, moreover, may lead to
> inconsistencies.
>
> Example:
> attribute-sets:
> ...
> name: pin
> enum-name: dpll_a_pin
> attributes:
> ...
> -
> name: parent-id
> type: u32
> ...
> -
> name: pin-parent-device
> subset-of: pin
> attributes:
> -
> name: parent-id
> type: u32 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> Remove the requirement from schema files to specify the "type" and add
> check and bail out if "type" is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
What about updating accordingly the existing specs? They are used as
references, I think it would be better if the info there would be
consistent.
I think the tool still allows writing something alike:
attributes:
...
-
name: parent-id
type: u32
...
-
name: pin-parent-device
subset-of: pin
attributes:
-
name: parent-id
type: string
(mismatching types). What about adding an explicit test to prevent
specifying again the types for already defined attributes?
Cheers,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 14:21 [patch net-next] tools: ynl-gen: lift type requirement for attribute subsets Jiri Pirko
2023-09-28 10:15 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2023-09-29 11:18 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ffeeac4ea45e5a087aab44ac137a945111d941e7.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox