Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] netdevsim: psp: remove unnecessary UDP checksum computation
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:01:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.1d153b0dc9762@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508-nsim-psp-crypto-v1-2-4b50ed09b794@gmail.com>

Daniel Zahka wrote:
> The PSP spec requires the implementations accept 0 checksum in psp-udp
> header. Let's take advantage of that to trim netdevsim's psp code
> down. psp_dev_encapsulate() already sets uh->check to 0.
> 
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c | 32 --------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> index 5073bda60883..75740e2a731f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  
> -#include <linux/ip.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
> -#include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
>  #include <net/psp.h>
>  #include <net/sock.h>
>  
> @@ -81,36 +79,6 @@ nsim_do_psp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netdevsim *ns,
>  			      skb->len - skb_inner_transport_offset(skb));
>  		u64_stats_update_end(&ns->psp.syncp);
>  	} else {
> -		struct ipv6hdr *ip6h __maybe_unused;
> -		struct iphdr *iph;
> -		struct udphdr *uh;
> -		__wsum csum;
> -
> -		/* Do not decapsulate. Receive the skb with the udp and psp
> -		 * headers still there as if this is a normal udp packet.
> -		 * psp_dev_encapsulate() sets udp checksum to 0, so we need to
> -		 * provide a valid checksum here, so the skb isn't dropped.
> -		 */

Perhaps this was here as IPv6 does not allow zero checksums except for
tunneling in specific cases (RFC 6936)?

It seems benign enough to keep the code. Do you have a specific reason
to remove it, beyond reducing LoC?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08 14:53 [PATCH net-next 0/6] netdevsim: psp: implement real crypto operations from the PSP spec Daniel Zahka
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] netdevsim: psp: reset spi on key rotation and check for exhaustion on alloc Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 16:53   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] netdevsim: psp: remove unnecessary UDP checksum computation Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 17:01   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-05-11 17:46     ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 19:01       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 19:43         ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] netdevsim: psp: move rx processing into nsim_poll() Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:03   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-12  0:25     ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-12  0:51       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] netdevsim: psp: implement kdf from psp spec Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 19:49   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 23:55     ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-12  0:48       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] netdevsim: psp: add real aes-gcm encryption and decryption Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:10   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] netdevsim: psp: count rx authentication and length errors Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:19   ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.1d153b0dc9762@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox