From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] netdevsim: psp: reset spi on key rotation and check for exhaustion on alloc
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 12:53:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.22d046e36117d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508-nsim-psp-crypto-v1-1-4b50ed09b794@gmail.com>
Daniel Zahka wrote:
> The PSP spec states that the lower 31b of the SPI need to be
> non-zero. Though not in the spec, I think it is reasonable to reset
> the lower 31b of the spi space after a key rotation, and to also
> decline to generate session keys when the lower 31b saturate.
Since this is already a 6 patch series, these two independent changes
could be separate patches.
Agreed on both points btw.
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> index 6936ecb8173e..5073bda60883 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> @@ -132,14 +132,14 @@ nsim_rx_spi_alloc(struct psp_dev *psd, u32 version,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct netdevsim *ns = psd->drv_priv;
> - unsigned int new;
> int i;
>
> - new = ++ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_ID;
> - if (psd->generation & 1)
> - new |= PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE;
> + if ((ns->psp.spi ^ (ns->psp.spi + 1)) & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "SPI space exhausted");
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
Can this all be more readable without the use of XORs? This is not hot
path code that needs to be optimized.
if (ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_ID == INT32_MAX) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "SPI space exhausted");
return -ENOSPC;
}
> - assoc->spi = cpu_to_be32(new);
> + assoc->spi = cpu_to_be32(++ns->psp.spi);
> assoc->key[0] = psd->generation;
> for (i = 1; i < PSP_MAX_KEY; i++)
> assoc->key[i] = ns->psp.spi + i;
> @@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ static int nsim_assoc_add(struct psp_dev *psd, struct psp_assoc *pas,
>
> static int nsim_key_rotate(struct psp_dev *psd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> + struct netdevsim *ns = psd->drv_priv;
> +
> + ns->psp.spi = (ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE) ^ PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE;
> +
/* Flip key phase and reset SPI to 0 within that space
* (will be pre-incremented, as 0 is an invalid SPI)
*/
if (ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE)
ns->psp.spi = 0;
else
ns->psp.spi = PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE;
Even while making the code more self evident I still feel it needs a
comment to explain all that is going on.
Maybe it can be more self-evident.
Or maybe you find the XOR just as readable already.
Your call. A comment might be helpful either way.
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 14:53 [PATCH net-next 0/6] netdevsim: psp: implement real crypto operations from the PSP spec Daniel Zahka
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] netdevsim: psp: reset spi on key rotation and check for exhaustion on alloc Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 16:53 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] netdevsim: psp: remove unnecessary UDP checksum computation Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 17:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 17:46 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 19:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 19:43 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] netdevsim: psp: move rx processing into nsim_poll() Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-12 0:25 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-12 0:51 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] netdevsim: psp: implement kdf from psp spec Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 19:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 23:55 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-12 0:48 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] netdevsim: psp: add real aes-gcm encryption and decryption Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] netdevsim: psp: count rx authentication and length errors Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.22d046e36117d@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox