Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,  horms@kernel.org,  pabeni@redhat.com,
	 edumazet@google.com,  davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13 net-next] Allow compiling an IPv6-only kernel network stack
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 13:08:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.736256d759b9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d1557c8-6e0b-42cb-9132-b150f211444a@suse.de>

Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> On 9/15/26 2:24 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:48:25 +0200 Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> >> The primary goal of this patch series is to enable the compilation of an
> >> IPv6-only kernel by decoupling the core networking infrastructure from the IPv4
> >> protocol.
> > 
> > Could you useful to know for example how many of the recent CVEs were
> > IPv4 specific, if you have enough token budget to get such data?
> > 
> 
> Hi Jakub I will include the numbers in the v2 cover letter but in essence:
> 
> 0.3% (32) of the released CVEs since 2025. FWIW, this only includes 
> strictly IPv4-only code. The percentage is also stable over time if we 
> extend the search up to 2020, 0.3% (57) of the released CVEs.
> 
> > High level, I don't have must to say beyond what you already know -
> > the code movement may be too painful for backports. There are too
> > many ifdefs (as Stan pointed out).
> > 
> 
> Yes, the code movement is the biggest pain. Regarding the ifdefs, they 
> are being reduced greatly in the v2 as I have decided to rely on DCE 
> (Dead Code Elimination) to avoid using them. The code looks much better 
> this way.

On code movement: are the large code block movements into separate ipv4
files needed, or could those just as well stay in place, behind an if
enabled check?


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10 14:48 [PATCH 00/13 net-next] Allow compiling an IPv6-only kernel network stack Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 01/13 net-next] net: ipv4: introduce CONFIG_IPV4 to decouple the IPv4 stack Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 15:11   ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-10 15:32     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 15:36     ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-10 16:22   ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 16:30     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 16:56   ` Sven Eckelmann
2026-09-11 18:39     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 18:55   ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-11 17:46   ` Casey Schaufler
2026-09-11 18:31     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-11 18:59       ` Casey Schaufler
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/13 net-next] net: core: add IPv4 fallback stubs and guards for CONFIG_IPV4=n Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 03/13 net-next] net: inet: relocate ip_generic_getfrag and guard IPv4 socket logic Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 21:19   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-11 18:41     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 13:29     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 04/13 net-next] net: tcp: move protocol agnostic TCP functions out of tcp_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 05/13 net-next] net: raw: split IPv4 specific logic into raw_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 06/13 net-next] net: udp: split IPv4 specific logic into udp_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 07/13 net-next] net: icmp: split IPv4 specific logic into icmp_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 08/13 net-next] net: ping: split IPv4 specific logic into ping_ipv4.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 09/13 net-next] net: fib: split common nexthop logic to fib_core.c Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 10/13 net-next] net: tunnel: guard IPv4 tunnel functions with CONFIG_IPV4 Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 11/13 net-next] netfilter: ipv4: guard ip_route_me_harder() " Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 12/13 net-next] net: ipv4: disable IPv4-only sysctls when CONFIG_IPV4=n Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-15 12:16   ` Joel Granados
2026-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 13/13 net-next] net: ipv4: make CONFIG_IPV4 boolean Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-15  0:24 ` [PATCH 00/13 net-next] Allow compiling an IPv6-only kernel network stack Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-28 13:37   ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 17:08     ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-09-28 19:15       ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.736256d759b9@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox