Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@average.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Suboptimal error handling in libnftables
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:58:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b606613-076e-9b05-5283-46ade61292b2@average.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YajP+n5qYEZOzmCD@salvia>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2728 bytes --]

On 02/12/2021 14:54, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Eugene Crosser wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> there is read-from-the-socket loop in src/iface.c line 90 (function
>> iface_cache_update()), and it (and other places) call macro
>> netlink_init_error() to report error. The function behind the macro is
>> in src/netlink.c line 81, and it calls exit(NFT_EXIT_NONL) after writing
>> a message to stderr.
>>
>> I see two problems with this:
>>
>> 1. All read-from-the-socket functions should be run in a loop, repeating
>> if return code is -1 and errno is EINTR. I.e. EINTR should not be
>> treated as an error, but as a condition that requires retry.
>>
>> 2. Library functions are not supposed to call exit() (or abort() for
>> that matter). They are expected to return an error indication to the
>> caller, who may have its own strategy for handling error conditions.
>>
>> Case in point, we have a daemon (in Python) that uses bindings to
>> libnftables. It's a service responding to requests coming over a TCP
>> connection, and it takes care to intercept any error situations and
>> report them back. We discovered that under some conditions, it just
>> closes the socket and goes away. This being a daemon, stderr was not
>> immediately accessible; and even it it were, it is pretty hard to figure
>> where did the message "iface.c:98: Unable to initialize Netlink socket:
>> Interrupted system call" come from and why!
> 
> This missing EINTR handling for iface_cache_update() is a bug, would
> you post a patch for this?

It looks like there is more than just a missing retry when
socket-receive returns EINTR. In the code in src/iface.c between lines
87 and 98, EINTR may come from one of two functions:
mnl_socket_recvfrom() and mnl_cb_run(). If it is returned by
mnl_socket_recvfrom(), the correct course of action is to blindly call
that function again. But when it is returned by mnl_cb_run(), the
meaning is different. mnl_cb_run() retruns -1 and sets errno=EINTR when
netlink message contained NLM_F_DUMP_INTR. I assume (though I am not
sure) that NLM_F_DUMP_INTR means that the data that is being transferred
has changed while transfer was only partially complete, and the user is
advised to restart _the whole dump process_ by sending a new NLM_F_DUMP
request message. (Arguably, libmnl ought to report such situation with
some other indication, not EINTR.) In any case, I believe that the
aforementioned code should handle both of these two "need to retry" cases.

I our tests it looks like we are hitting NLM_F_DUMP_INTR rather then
interrupted socket recv(). I will report back after this is verified.

Best regards,

Eugene

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-06 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02 13:16 Suboptimal error handling in libnftables Eugene Crosser
2021-12-02 13:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-12-02 14:03   ` Eugene Crosser
2021-12-02 15:50     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-12-06 16:58   ` Eugene Crosser [this message]
2021-12-06 19:56     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b606613-076e-9b05-5283-46ade61292b2@average.org \
    --to=crosser@average.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox