Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@average.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Suboptimal error handling in libnftables
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:03:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed4f2e2e-50c5-926a-305d-4cd1c7550392@average.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YajP+n5qYEZOzmCD@salvia>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1040 bytes --]

Hello Pablo,

On 02/12/2021 14:54, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:

>> 1. All read-from-the-socket functions should be run in a loop, repeating
>> if return code is -1 and errno is EINTR. I.e. EINTR should not be
>> treated as an error, but as a condition that requires retry.
[...]> This missing EINTR handling for iface_cache_update() is a bug, would
> you post a patch for this?

I have a patch that is currently under our internal testing. Will post
it here once I get the results of testing.

>> There is another function that calls exit(), __netlink_abi_error(). I
>> believe that even in such a harsh situation, exit() is not the right way
>> to handle it.
> 
> ABI breakage between kernel and userspace should not ever happen.

Well, maybe at least use abort() then? It's better to have a dump with a
stack trace than have the process silently terminate. Libnftables may be
deep down the stack of dependencies, it can be hard to find the source
of the problem from just an stderr message.

Best regards,

Eugene

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-02 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02 13:16 Suboptimal error handling in libnftables Eugene Crosser
2021-12-02 13:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-12-02 14:03   ` Eugene Crosser [this message]
2021-12-02 15:50     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-12-06 16:58   ` Eugene Crosser
2021-12-06 19:56     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed4f2e2e-50c5-926a-305d-4cd1c7550392@average.org \
    --to=crosser@average.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox