Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@gmail.com>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: l4_packet returning NF_DROP
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:02:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903121603.02733.christoph.paasch@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903121444.37625.christoph.paasch@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1938 bytes --]

Well, I have seen, that in one of the previous patches from pablo, he adds 
if (ret == -NF_DROP)

inside the if (ret < 0)

but as NF_DROP is 0, it won't ever enter in if(ret == -NF_DROP)

I will make a patch...

On Thu March 12 2009 wrote Christoph Paasch:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding the call to l4_packet, in nf_conntrack_in(...)
> from nf_conntrack_core.c
>
> When a module like TCP returns -NF_DROP in tcp_packet(...), the packet
> won't get dropped, because NF_DROP = 0, and in nf_conntrack_in the return
> of the call to l4_packet is checked:
> if (ret < 0) {
> 	...
> }
>
> So, there is no way to drop packets after l4_packet.
>
> Why does this is implemented that way?
>
> There are several points in tcp_packet where the function returns -NF_DROP
> and the comments in this function say that the packet will get blocked.
>
> For example (from tcp_packet):
>
> 	if (index == TCP_SYNACK_SET
> 		    && ct->proto.tcp.last_index == TCP_SYN_SET
> 		    && ct->proto.tcp.last_dir != dir
> 		    && ntohl(th->ack_seq) == ct->proto.tcp.last_end) {
> 			/* b) This SYN/ACK acknowledges a SYN that we earlier
> 			 * ignored as invalid. This means that the client and
> 			 * the server are both in sync, while the firewall is
> 			 * not. We kill this session and block the SYN/ACK so
> 			 * that the client cannot but retransmit its SYN and
> 			 * thus initiate a clean new session.
> 			 */
> 			write_unlock_bh(&tcp_lock);
> 			if (LOG_INVALID(net, IPPROTO_TCP))
> 				nf_log_packet(pf, 0, skb, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> 					  "nf_ct_tcp: killing out of sync session ");
> 			nf_ct_kill(ct);
> 			return -NF_DROP;
> 		}
>
> I hope, that I was clear.
> Could someone please explain this to me?
> And how can I block packets after the call to l4_packet?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Christoph Paasch
>
> www.rollerbulls.be
> --

--
Christoph Paasch

www.rollerbulls.be
--

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-12 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-12 13:44 l4_packet returning NF_DROP Christoph Paasch
2009-03-12 15:02 ` Christoph Paasch [this message]
2009-03-12 15:13   ` [PATCH] netfilter: Allow dropping packet after call to l4proto->packet Christoph Paasch
2009-03-12 15:34     ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-12 15:49       ` Christoph Paasch
2009-03-12 16:07         ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-12 17:27       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-12 17:26     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-13  8:27       ` Christoph Paasch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200903121603.02733.christoph.paasch@gmail.com \
    --to=christoph.paasch@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox