From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@gmail.com>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: l4_packet returning NF_DROP
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:02:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903121603.02733.christoph.paasch@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903121444.37625.christoph.paasch@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1938 bytes --]
Well, I have seen, that in one of the previous patches from pablo, he adds
if (ret == -NF_DROP)
inside the if (ret < 0)
but as NF_DROP is 0, it won't ever enter in if(ret == -NF_DROP)
I will make a patch...
On Thu March 12 2009 wrote Christoph Paasch:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding the call to l4_packet, in nf_conntrack_in(...)
> from nf_conntrack_core.c
>
> When a module like TCP returns -NF_DROP in tcp_packet(...), the packet
> won't get dropped, because NF_DROP = 0, and in nf_conntrack_in the return
> of the call to l4_packet is checked:
> if (ret < 0) {
> ...
> }
>
> So, there is no way to drop packets after l4_packet.
>
> Why does this is implemented that way?
>
> There are several points in tcp_packet where the function returns -NF_DROP
> and the comments in this function say that the packet will get blocked.
>
> For example (from tcp_packet):
>
> if (index == TCP_SYNACK_SET
> && ct->proto.tcp.last_index == TCP_SYN_SET
> && ct->proto.tcp.last_dir != dir
> && ntohl(th->ack_seq) == ct->proto.tcp.last_end) {
> /* b) This SYN/ACK acknowledges a SYN that we earlier
> * ignored as invalid. This means that the client and
> * the server are both in sync, while the firewall is
> * not. We kill this session and block the SYN/ACK so
> * that the client cannot but retransmit its SYN and
> * thus initiate a clean new session.
> */
> write_unlock_bh(&tcp_lock);
> if (LOG_INVALID(net, IPPROTO_TCP))
> nf_log_packet(pf, 0, skb, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> "nf_ct_tcp: killing out of sync session ");
> nf_ct_kill(ct);
> return -NF_DROP;
> }
>
> I hope, that I was clear.
> Could someone please explain this to me?
> And how can I block packets after the call to l4_packet?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Christoph Paasch
>
> www.rollerbulls.be
> --
--
Christoph Paasch
www.rollerbulls.be
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-12 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-12 13:44 l4_packet returning NF_DROP Christoph Paasch
2009-03-12 15:02 ` Christoph Paasch [this message]
2009-03-12 15:13 ` [PATCH] netfilter: Allow dropping packet after call to l4proto->packet Christoph Paasch
2009-03-12 15:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-12 15:49 ` Christoph Paasch
2009-03-12 16:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-12 17:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-12 17:26 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-13 8:27 ` Christoph Paasch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903121603.02733.christoph.paasch@gmail.com \
--to=christoph.paasch@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox