Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@eitzenberger.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
	pablo@netfilter.org,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nf_conntrack.acct has no effect
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:24:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090317082425.GA25491@mail.eitzenberger.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BE84D4.7050804@trash.net>

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:56:52PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Currently the default is set based on the old config option.
> When unset, no acct-extend is allocated for *new* conntracks.
> The old ones that do have an acct-extend are still displayed.

I think the current implementation is unfortunate, because the
connbytes match auto-selects CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT, and you end up having
the message always and can't get rid of it other than patching
it out.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-17 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-16 16:53 nf_conntrack.acct has no effect Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-16 16:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-16 18:01   ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17  8:24   ` Holger Eitzenberger [this message]
2009-03-17 13:02     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:13       ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:31         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:32           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:50           ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:51             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:55               ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:57                 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:18                   ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 14:22                     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:36                       ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 14:38                         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:11     ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:28       ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17 13:52         ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:54           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:39         ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17 14:41           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 15:41             ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-18  4:32               ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090317082425.GA25491@mail.eitzenberger.org \
    --to=holger@eitzenberger.org \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox