From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nf_conntrack.acct has no effect
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:56:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BE84D4.7050804@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0903161749530.16494@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> A forum made me (re)aware of
>
> Mar 15 18:20:25 wild-thing kernel: nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (16384 buckets, 65536 max)
> Mar 15 18:20:25 wild-thing kernel: CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT is deprecated and will be removed soon. Plase use
> Mar 15 18:20:25 wild-thing kernel: nf_conntrack.acct=1 kernel paramater, acct=1 nf_conntrack module option or
> Mar 15 18:20:25 wild-thing kernel: sysctl net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_acct=1 to enable it.
>
> which prompted me to look into this a bit in detail. I was wondering
> which functionality I would lose on not setting nf_conntrack.acct. To
> my surprise, there is no loss of functionality, as the "nf_ct_acct"
> in nf_conntrack_acct.c nor /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct
> which is the accompanied sysctl file cause the packet or byte
> counters to disappear from `conntrack -L` or /proc/net/nf_conntrack.
>
> Should the message be removed? Should the missing check for
> nf_ct_acct be included?
Currently the default is set based on the old config option.
When unset, no acct-extend is allocated for *new* conntracks.
The old ones that do have an acct-extend are still displayed.
Does that explain your observation?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-16 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-16 16:53 nf_conntrack.acct has no effect Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-16 16:56 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-03-16 18:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17 8:24 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-17 13:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:13 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:50 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:55 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:18 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 14:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:36 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 14:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:11 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:28 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17 13:52 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:39 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17 14:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 15:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-18 4:32 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49BE84D4.7050804@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox