Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 002/108] netfilter: ctnetlink: be more strict when NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set
       [not found] <20200411230943.24951-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2020-04-11 23:07 ` Sasha Levin
  2020-04-11 23:09 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 083/108] netfilter: nf_tables: silence a RCU-list warning in nft_table_lookup() Sasha Levin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-04-11 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Romain Bellan, Florent Fourcot, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Sasha Levin,
	netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev

From: Romain Bellan <romain.bellan@wifirst.fr>

[ Upstream commit 7c6b4121627aeaa79536fbb900feafec740410d3 ]

When CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set, any CTA_MARK or CTA_MARK_MASK
in netlink message are not supported. We should return an error when one
of them is set, not both

Fixes: 9306425b70bf ("netfilter: ctnetlink: must check mark attributes vs NULL")
Signed-off-by: Romain Bellan <romain.bellan@wifirst.fr>
Signed-off-by: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@wifirst.fr>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index aa8adf930b3ce..bb9c7569b9729 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ ctnetlink_alloc_filter(const struct nlattr * const cda[], u8 family)
 	struct ctnetlink_filter *filter;
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK
-	if (cda[CTA_MARK] && cda[CTA_MARK_MASK])
+	if (cda[CTA_MARK] || cda[CTA_MARK_MASK])
 		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
 #endif
 
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 083/108] netfilter: nf_tables: silence a RCU-list warning in nft_table_lookup()
       [not found] <20200411230943.24951-1-sashal@kernel.org>
  2020-04-11 23:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 002/108] netfilter: ctnetlink: be more strict when NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set Sasha Levin
@ 2020-04-11 23:09 ` Sasha Levin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-04-11 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Qian Cai, Florian Westphal, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Sasha Levin,
	netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev

From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>

[ Upstream commit 0a6a9515fe390976cd762c52d8d4f446d7a14285 ]

It is safe to traverse &net->nft.tables with &net->nft.commit_mutex
held using list_for_each_entry_rcu(). Silence the PROVE_RCU_LIST false
positive,

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:523 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by iptables/1384:
 #0: ffffffff9745c4a8 (&net->nft.commit_mutex){+.+.}, at: nf_tables_valid_genid+0x25/0x60 [nf_tables]

Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xa1/0xea
 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x103/0x10d
 nft_table_lookup.part.0+0x116/0x120 [nf_tables]
 nf_tables_newtable+0x12c/0x7d0 [nf_tables]
 nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0x559/0x1190 [nfnetlink]
 nfnetlink_rcv+0x1da/0x210 [nfnetlink]
 netlink_unicast+0x306/0x460
 netlink_sendmsg+0x44b/0x770
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x46b/0x4a0
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x138/0x1a0
 __sys_sendmsg+0xb6/0x130
 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x48/0x50
 do_syscall_64+0x69/0xf4
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3

Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 068daff41f6e6..e94326cc853c2 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -456,7 +456,8 @@ static struct nft_table *nft_table_lookup(const struct net *net,
 	if (nla == NULL)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, &net->nft.tables, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, &net->nft.tables, list,
+				lockdep_is_held(&net->nft.commit_mutex)) {
 		if (!nla_strcmp(nla, table->name) &&
 		    table->family == family &&
 		    nft_active_genmask(table, genmask))
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-11 23:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20200411230943.24951-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-11 23:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 002/108] netfilter: ctnetlink: be more strict when NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:09 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 083/108] netfilter: nf_tables: silence a RCU-list warning in nft_table_lookup() Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox