[RFC PATCH 0/1] libnftnl: Incorrect res_id byte order?

[Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com>]

I am marking this as an RFC and including this cover letter, because
I'm not absolutely 100% sure that the current code is incorrect.  (It
obviously works, or this would have come up before.)

AFAICT, the res_id of struct nfgenmsg is supposed to be in network byte
order, and that isn't happening on little endian systems.
nftnl_batch_begin() and nftnl_batch_end() both pass NFNL_SUBSYS_NFTABLES
(10) to __nftnl_nlmsg_build_hdr(), but without a call to htons(), the
message contains 2560 (when interpretted in network byte order).

Ian Pilcher (1):
  libnftnl: Fix res_id byte order

 src/common.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


base-commit: 461f36979f4ed2b6cc95f06cf5f9c3c84bdf9e70
-- 
2.37.3