From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] add support for modifying secmark via ctnetlink
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:13:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4834582D.8090009@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1211388856.7486.366.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 12:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>> I agree with James that we need to perform some access check before
>> setting the ct->secmark field, however, I don't think it is as simple
>> as calling selinux_secmark_relabel_packet_permission(). The problem is
>> that the selinux_secmark_relabel_packet_permission() function checks to
>> see if the currently running task can relabel packets; in this case we
>> don't want to check the currently running task we want to check the
>> sender of the netlink message which we can't really do currently.
>
> Sending task SID is saved in NETLINK_CB(skb).sid at send time, so the
> information is available (but would need to be passed into the
> function).
This part can actually be removed from af_netlink, see the message
I just sent to Paul for reference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 22:29 [PATCH 3/4] add support for modifying secmark via ctnetlink Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-05-21 11:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-21 11:42 ` James Morris
2008-05-21 12:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-21 16:46 ` Paul Moore
2008-05-21 16:54 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-05-21 17:13 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-05-22 18:11 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-05-22 19:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-21 17:41 ` Paul Moore
2008-05-21 17:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-21 17:51 ` Paul Moore
2008-05-21 17:55 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-05-21 19:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4834582D.8090009@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox