Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabian Hugelshofer <hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] dynamic calculation of event message size for ctnetlin
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:54:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4891EE55.5020102@gmx.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4891EB67.7000404@netfilter.org>

Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
>> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>> [PATCH] dynamic calculation of event message size for ctnetlink
>>>
>>> This patch adds dynamic message size calculation for ctnetlink. This
>>> reduces CPU consumption since the overhead in the message trimming
>>> is removed.
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> Just did some performance tests. On average it saves 5% CPU usage at
>> ~1600pps (UDP packets, 1000B payload, random source ports) on my router
>> (IXP4XX, 266Mhz).
>>
>> With the unclean patch the performance gain was slightly higher. I have
>> posted it was 10%, but as far as I remember it was actually a bit less
>> then that. The remaining difference can be explained by the length
>> calculation overhead and measuring inaccuracy.
> 
> How are you measuring CPU consumption? I would not trust "top" or
> something similar too much. I usually use cyclesoak, however I guess
> that you'll need a bit of hacking to get it working there.
> 
> I'll try to do some measurements in my platform soon anyway.

I am using top indeed. I run it in batch mode with a period of 10s and 
dump to a file. At the end I calculate the average idle usage over 5 
periods (ignoring the first one).


      reply	other threads:[~2008-07-31 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-30 11:06 [PATCH 7/7] dynamic calculation of event message size for ctnetlin Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-31 16:26 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-07-31 16:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-31 16:54     ` Fabian Hugelshofer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4891EE55.5020102@gmx.ch \
    --to=hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox