From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>,
Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Coreteam <coreteam@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Netfilter: match "tcp option" with the same type present multiple times
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 23:22:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6989a3c1-313c-4802-b78c-ceb3f2dbd3da@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c08f9e6-123f-4514-a865-6f9e0f979167@suse.de>
Hi Fernando,
On 28/09/2026 23:17, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> On 9/28/26 10:54 PM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>> On 9/28/26 2:13 PM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> Hello Netfilter devs,
>>>
>>> First, thank you for maintaining Netfilter in the kernel and the
>>> userspace tools.
>>>
>>> The MPTCP selftests are switching from IPTables to NFTables, and
>>> Clashiko reported that this part of a rule wouldn't match anything:
>>>
>>> tcp option mptcp subtype remove-addr drop
>>>
>>> When an MPTCP REMOVE_ADDR suboption (type 0x30, len >=4, subtype 0x4) is
>>> added to the TCP options, it is added after an MPTCP DSS option (type
>>> 0x30, len >= 8, subtype 0x2). In other words, there will be two MPTCP
>>> (type 30) options in the TCP options. It looks like Netfilter doesn't
>>> handle that, because it stops processing other TCP options when the
>>> expected type is found:
>>>
>>> net/netfilter/nft_exthdr.c:nft_exthdr_tcp_eval() {
>>> ...
>>> for (i = sizeof(*tcph); i < tcphdr_len - 1; i += optl) {
>>> optl = optlen(opt, i);
>>>
>>> if (priv->type != opt[i])
>>> continue;
>>> ...
>>> return; // <== it will look at the first MPTCP option
>>> }
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> It looks like it shouldn't stop if the wrong subtype is found, but the
>>> subtype is not compared there if I'm not mistaken. Should there be a fix
>>> to support this case?
>>>
>>> For more details about the Clashiko report:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/179058242453.3145.1450534124183352369@kernel.org
>>>
>>>
>>> BTW, I'm probably missing something, but adding the following doesn't
>>> seem to have any effect on my side:
>>>
>>> nft add table ip filter
>>> nft add chain ip filter OUTPUT \
>>> { type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept; }
>>> nft insert rule ip filter OUTPUT tcp option mptcp exists counter drop
>>>
>>> Same with "mptcp subtype mp-capable", other subtypes or other types like
>>> "timestamp". But if I use ...
>>>
>>> nft insert rule ip filter OUTPUT meta l4proto tcp counter drop
>>>
>>> ... then the drop is effective. Any idea what I'm missing here? :)
>>>
>>>
>>> (Also, it looks like the MPTCP suboptions are not documented in the nft
>>> man page :) )
>>>
>>
>> Tomorrow there should be a patch in netfilter-devel adding it, we
>> definitively should put more work into documentation.
>>
>
> While at it, I will also document the existing limitation that was
> discussed above too.
Great, thank you for looking at all this :)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 12:13 Netfilter: match "tcp option" with the same type present multiple times Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 13:13 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 20:26 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 21:08 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 20:56 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:22 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 21:23 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 20:54 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:17 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:22 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-09-28 21:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-29 9:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-29 10:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-29 10:40 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-29 12:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-30 18:33 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-10-06 23:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-07 8:01 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-07 10:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-07 8:17 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 21:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2026-09-29 9:34 ` Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6989a3c1-313c-4802-b78c-ceb3f2dbd3da@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox