From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cc: Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Coreteam <coreteam@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Netfilter: match "tcp option" with the same type present multiple times
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 23:52:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arrhlKkKSSKFp4Sq@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a391d81c-0bce-41e6-886e-a558765c6891@kernel.org>
Hi Mattieu,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 02:13:16PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hello Netfilter devs,
>
> First, thank you for maintaining Netfilter in the kernel and the
> userspace tools.
>
> The MPTCP selftests are switching from IPTables to NFTables, and
> Clashiko reported that this part of a rule wouldn't match anything:
>
> tcp option mptcp subtype remove-addr drop
>
> When an MPTCP REMOVE_ADDR suboption (type 0x30, len >=4, subtype 0x4) is
> added to the TCP options, it is added after an MPTCP DSS option (type
> 0x30, len >= 8, subtype 0x2). In other words, there will be two MPTCP
> (type 30) options in the TCP options. It looks like Netfilter doesn't
> handle that, because it stops processing other TCP options when the
> expected type is found:
>
> net/netfilter/nft_exthdr.c:nft_exthdr_tcp_eval() {
> ...
> for (i = sizeof(*tcph); i < tcphdr_len - 1; i += optl) {
> optl = optlen(opt, i);
>
> if (priv->type != opt[i])
> continue;
> ...
> return; // <== it will look at the first MPTCP option
> }
> ...
> }
>
> It looks like it shouldn't stop if the wrong subtype is found, but the
> subtype is not compared there if I'm not mistaken. Should there be a fix
> to support this case?
Would it work for you if you can specify what TCP option you want to
match? ie.
tcp option[2] mptcp subtype remove-addr drop
^
|
|
allow to specify a match at a given tcp option
Or would this be too strict for your use-case and you would prefer
that you can match it anywhere?
Thanks.
> For more details about the Clashiko report:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/179058242453.3145.1450534124183352369@kernel.org
>
>
> BTW, I'm probably missing something, but adding the following doesn't
> seem to have any effect on my side:
>
> nft add table ip filter
> nft add chain ip filter OUTPUT \
> { type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept; }
> nft insert rule ip filter OUTPUT tcp option mptcp exists counter drop
>
> Same with "mptcp subtype mp-capable", other subtypes or other types like
> "timestamp". But if I use ...
>
> nft insert rule ip filter OUTPUT meta l4proto tcp counter drop
>
> ... then the drop is effective. Any idea what I'm missing here? :)
>
>
> (Also, it looks like the MPTCP suboptions are not documented in the nft
> man page :) )
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
> --
> Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 12:13 Netfilter: match "tcp option" with the same type present multiple times Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 13:13 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 20:26 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 21:08 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 20:56 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:22 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 21:23 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 20:54 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:17 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:22 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 21:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-09-29 9:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-29 10:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-29 10:40 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-29 12:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-30 18:33 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-10-06 23:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-07 8:01 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-07 10:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-07 8:17 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 21:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2026-09-29 9:34 ` Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arrhlKkKSSKFp4Sq@chamomile \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox