* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] tools/net/ynl: Add multi message support to ynl
[not found] ` <20240329144639.0b42dc19@kernel.org>
@ 2024-03-29 22:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2024-03-29 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Donald Hunter, netdev, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni,
Jiri Pirko, Jacob Keller, Stanislav Fomichev, donald.hunter, fw,
netfilter-devel
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 02:46:39PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:01:09 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote:
> > There's no response for 'batch-begin' or 'batch-end'. We may need a
> > per op spec property to tell us if a request will be acknowledged.
>
> :(
>
> Pablo, could we possibly start processing the ACK flags on those
> messages? Maybe the existing user space doesn't set ACK so nobody
> would notice?
>
> I don't think the messages are otherwise marked as special from
> the "netlink layer" perspective.
It is possible to explore this. I don't have a use-case for NLM_F_ACK
and the begin marker message at this stage.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread