Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC nf-next 2/4] netfilter: nf_tables: allow loads only when register is initialized
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:31:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoMSIF0jVEe1ro5T@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240627135330.17039-3-fw@strlen.de>

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 03:53:22PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> @@ -11105,8 +11107,8 @@ static int nft_validate_register_load(enum nft_registers reg, unsigned int len)
>  int nft_parse_register_load(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>  			    const struct nlattr *attr, u8 *sreg, u32 len)
>  {
> -	u32 reg;
> -	int err;
> +	int err, invalid_reg;
> +	u32 reg, next_register;
>  
>  	err = nft_parse_register(attr, &reg);
>  	if (err < 0)
> @@ -11116,11 +11118,36 @@ int nft_parse_register_load(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		return err;
>  
> +	next_register = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, NFT_REG32_SIZE) + reg;
> +
> +	/* Can't happen: nft_validate_register_load() should have failed */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(next_register > NFT_REG32_NUM))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* find first register that did not see an earlier store. */
> +	invalid_reg = find_next_zero_bit(ctx->reg_inited, NFT_REG32_NUM, reg);

Is this assuming that register allocation from userspace is done secuencially?

> +	/* invalid register within the range that we're loading from? */
> +	if (invalid_reg < next_register)
> +		return -ENODATA;
> +
>  	*sreg = reg;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nft_parse_register_load);

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-01 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-27 13:53 [RFC nf-next 0/4] nf_tables: remove explicit register zeroing Florian Westphal
2024-06-27 13:53 ` [RFC nf-next 1/4] netfilter: nf_tables: pass context structure to nft_parse_register_load Florian Westphal
2024-06-27 13:53 ` [RFC nf-next 2/4] netfilter: nf_tables: allow loads only when register is initialized Florian Westphal
2024-07-01 20:31   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-07-01 22:16     ` Florian Westphal
2024-06-27 13:53 ` [RFC nf-next 3/4] netfilter: nf_tables: insert register zeroing instructions for dodgy chains Florian Westphal
2024-07-01 20:30   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-07-01 22:18     ` Florian Westphal
2024-07-01 22:32       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-06-27 13:53 ` [RFC nf-next 4/4] netfilter: nf_tables: don't initialize registers in nft_do_chain() Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZoMSIF0jVEe1ro5T@calendula \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox