From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Garver <e@erig.me>
Subject: Re: [nf-next PATCH v3 06/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Tolerate chains with no remaining hooks
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:19:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyOR-X0c6ToIR90y@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241031140104.GA21912@breakpoint.cc>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> > Do not drop a netdev-family chain if the last interface it is registered
> > for vanishes. Users dumping and storing the ruleset upon shutdown for
> > restore upon next boot may otherwise lose the chain and all contained
> > rules. They will still lose the list of devices, a later patch will fix
> > that. For now, this aligns the event handler's behaviour with that for
> > flowtables.
> > The controversal situation at netns exit should be no problem here:
> > event handler will unregister the hooks, core nftables cleanup code will
> > drop the chain itself.
>
> This "breaks"
> W: [DUMP FAIL] 1/2 tests/shell/testcases/json/netdev
> W: [DUMP FAIL] 2/2 tests/shell/testcases/chains/netdev_chain_0
>
> any suggestions on how to handle this?
>
> We can't fix the dump because old kernel will axe the empty basechain.
AFAIR, we did just that in the past with such cases. I agree, it pretty
much breaks any efforts at making the testsuite usable with stable
kernels.
> Should the dump files be removed?
Maybe "feature flag" it and introduce a mechanism for test cases to
revert to a different dump file?
Or we convince Pablo to axe his efforts at fixing chain deletion in
stable kernels and instead backport my "zombie chain" feature. ;)
Cheers, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-31 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-12 12:21 [nf-next PATCH v3 00/16] Dynamic hook interface binding Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 01/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Keep deleted flowtable hooks until after RCU Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 13:32 ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-12 13:48 ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 14:27 ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-16 0:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-09-16 21:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-09-17 21:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 02/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Flowtable hook's pf value never varies Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 03/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Store user-defined hook ifname Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:56 ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-12 13:26 ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 13:38 ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 04/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Use stored ifname in netdev hook dumps Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 05/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Compare netdev hooks based on stored name Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 06/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Tolerate chains with no remaining hooks Phil Sutter
2024-10-31 14:01 ` Florian Westphal
2024-10-31 14:19 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2024-10-31 14:37 ` Florian Westphal
2024-10-31 15:16 ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 07/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce functions freeing nft_hook objects Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 08/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce nft_hook_find_ops() Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 09/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce nft_register_flowtable_ops() Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 10/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Have a list of nf_hook_ops in nft_hook Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 11/16] netfilter: nf_tables: chain: Respect NETDEV_REGISTER events Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 14:40 ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-12 15:05 ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 15:12 ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-12 15:41 ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 16:06 ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-12 16:25 ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 20:43 ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-13 11:42 ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 12/16] netfilter: nf_tables: flowtable: " Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 13/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Handle NETDEV_CHANGENAME events Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 14/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Support wildcard netdev hook specs Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 15/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Add notications for hook changes Phil Sutter
2024-09-12 12:21 ` [nf-next PATCH v3 16/16] selftests: netfilter: Torture nftables netdev hooks Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyOR-X0c6ToIR90y@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=e@erig.me \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox