* [PATCH] netfilter: Set expressions out of range in nft_add_set_elem()
@ 2025-09-08 14:08 Chen Yufeng
2025-09-08 14:31 ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-08 15:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chen Yufeng @ 2025-09-08 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pablo; +Cc: kadlec, fw, netfilter-devel, Chen Yufeng
The number of `expr` expressions provided by userspace may exceed the
declared set expressions, potentially leading to errors or undefined behavior.
This patch addresses the issue by validating whether i exceeds
set->num_exprs.
This patch is inspired by commit 3701cd390fd7("netfilter: nf_tables:
bail out on mismatching dynset and set expressions").
Signed-off-by: Chen Yufeng <chenyufeng@iie.ac.cn>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 58c5425d61c2..958a7c8b0b4c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -7338,9 +7338,15 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
expr_array[i] = expr;
num_exprs++;
- if (set->num_exprs && expr->ops != set->exprs[i]->ops) {
- err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- goto err_set_elem_expr;
+ if (set->num_exprs) {
+ if (i >= set->num_exprs) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_set_elem_expr;
+ }
+ if (expr->ops != set->exprs[i]->ops) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto err_set_elem_expr;
+ }
}
i++;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: Set expressions out of range in nft_add_set_elem()
2025-09-08 14:08 [PATCH] netfilter: Set expressions out of range in nft_add_set_elem() Chen Yufeng
@ 2025-09-08 14:31 ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-08 15:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2025-09-08 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chen Yufeng; +Cc: pablo, kadlec, netfilter-devel
Chen Yufeng <chenyufeng@iie.ac.cn> wrote:
> The number of `expr` expressions provided by userspace may exceed the
> declared set expressions, potentially leading to errors or undefined behavior.
> This patch addresses the issue by validating whether i exceeds
> set->num_exprs.
Its already tested?
Please explain why this isn't enough and/or provide splat/backtrace.
nla_for_each_nested(tmp, nla[NFTA_SET_ELEM_EXPRESSIONS], left) {
if (i == NFT_SET_EXPR_MAX ||
(set->num_exprs && set->num_exprs == i)) {
err = -E2BIG;
goto err_set_elem_expr;
}
if (nla_type(tmp) != NFTA_LIST_ELEM) {
err = -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> index 58c5425d61c2..958a7c8b0b4c 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> @@ -7338,9 +7338,15 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
> expr_array[i] = expr;
> num_exprs++;
>
> - if (set->num_exprs && expr->ops != set->exprs[i]->ops) {
> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - goto err_set_elem_expr;
> + if (set->num_exprs) {
> + if (i >= set->num_exprs) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_set_elem_expr;
> + }
I don't see how we can hit the if (set->num_exprs && conditional with
i == set->num_exprs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: Set expressions out of range in nft_add_set_elem()
2025-09-08 14:08 [PATCH] netfilter: Set expressions out of range in nft_add_set_elem() Chen Yufeng
2025-09-08 14:31 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2025-09-08 15:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2025-09-08 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chen Yufeng; +Cc: kadlec, fw, netfilter-devel
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 10:08:44PM +0800, Chen Yufeng wrote:
> The number of `expr` expressions provided by userspace may exceed the
> declared set expressions, potentially leading to errors or undefined behavior.
> This patch addresses the issue by validating whether i exceeds
> set->num_exprs.
} else if (nla[NFTA_SET_ELEM_EXPRESSIONS]) {
struct nft_expr *expr;
struct nlattr *tmp;
int left;
i = 0;
nla_for_each_nested(tmp, nla[NFTA_SET_ELEM_EXPRESSIONS], left) {
if (i == NFT_SET_EXPR_MAX ||
(set->num_exprs && set->num_exprs == i)) {
There is this a upfront check to validate what you describe.
Are you reporting a different issue?
> This patch is inspired by commit 3701cd390fd7("netfilter: nf_tables:
> bail out on mismatching dynset and set expressions").
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yufeng <chenyufeng@iie.ac.cn>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> index 58c5425d61c2..958a7c8b0b4c 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> @@ -7338,9 +7338,15 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
> expr_array[i] = expr;
> num_exprs++;
>
> - if (set->num_exprs && expr->ops != set->exprs[i]->ops) {
> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - goto err_set_elem_expr;
> + if (set->num_exprs) {
> + if (i >= set->num_exprs) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_set_elem_expr;
> + }
> + if (expr->ops != set->exprs[i]->ops) {
> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto err_set_elem_expr;
> + }
> }
> i++;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-08 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-08 14:08 [PATCH] netfilter: Set expressions out of range in nft_add_set_elem() Chen Yufeng
2025-09-08 14:31 ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-08 15:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox