From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@sterenborg.info>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Is there a way....
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 05:45:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000601c66cd1$a5a31190$0101000a@sterenborg.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604301836350.26623@linux.dpsims.com>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use Linux to do NAT between some 192.168.x.x addresses
> in a routed network on one side and a single 10.0.0.x/24 on the other
> side. I want to do one-to-one NAT but in a dynamic way... such that a
> calling address is NATed into the next available 10.0.0.x/24.... in a
> round robin sort of way... IS there a way to do this using NETFILTER??
> If not NETFILTER, then how??
>
> This sort of thing is common in many-to-one NAT (port-address
> translation)... but I need each call to come from a separate NATed IP
> address to support my application (TN3270 session)... It's OK to reuse
> addresses after a call (session) is complete, but each session needs
> to come from it's own fixed (for the duration of the session) IP
> address....
>
> The exact application that I am trying to support is connecting to
> an IBM mainframe from random hosts in a routed network via an
> Attachmate gateway where calling addresses are mapped into terminal
> sessions on a 1:1 basis.... Port address translation won't work
> because all calls appear to eminate from the single IP address.... I
> need to do 1:1 NAT but only on a temporary basis where once a call is
> complete the NAT address can be used by another caller...
>
> Clues? Suggestions? Examples?
Have you tried the NETMAP target ? Using NETMAP I don't see a reason to
have to reuse IP addresses for NAT because you can NAT a complete subnet
1:1 with NETMAP.
http://www.netfilter.org/projects/patch-o-matic/pom-base.html#pom-base-N
ETMAP
Gr,
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-01 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-30 23:43 Is there a way David Sims
2006-04-30 21:15 ` kelly
2006-05-01 14:50 ` Andy Furniss
2006-05-01 3:45 ` Rob Sterenborg [this message]
2006-05-02 21:02 ` R. DuFresne
2006-05-03 2:22 ` David Sims
2006-05-02 22:40 ` kelly
2006-05-04 19:40 ` Pascal Hambourg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000601c66cd1$a5a31190$0101000a@sterenborg.info' \
--to=rob@sterenborg.info \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox