From: kelly@cliffhanger.com
To: David Sims <dpsims@dpsims.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Is there a way....
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:15:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060430211531.GH23121@Knoppix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604301836350.26623@linux.dpsims.com>
This link may have an answer. I haven't read the
entire thing but, it talks about netfilter and the
iproute2 utility.
http://www.policyrouting.org/PolicyRoutingBook/ONLINE/CH08.web.html
It's an online copy of a book (I have the hard
copy). It's a very good book.
Policy Routing With Linux - Online Edition
by Matthew G. Marsh
http://www.policyrouting.org/PolicyRoutingBook/ONLINE/TOC.html
--
kelly
http://home1.gte.net/res0psau/index.html#Hang-Gliding-Stuff
-- --
\ /
\/
/\
/ \
-- --
Quoting David Sims <dpsims@dpsims.com>:
Hi,
I want to use Linux to do NAT between some 192.168.x.x addresses
in a routed network on one side and a single 10.0.0.x/24 on the other
side. I want to do one-to-one NAT but in a dynamic way... such that a
calling address is NATed into the next available 10.0.0.x/24.... in a
round robin sort of way... IS there a way to do this using NETFILTER??
If not NETFILTER, then how??
This sort of thing is common in many-to-one NAT (port-address
translation)... but I need each call to come from a separate NATed IP
address to support my application (TN3270 session)... It's OK to reuse
addresses after a call (session) is complete, but each session needs to
come from it's own fixed (for the duration of the session) IP address....
The exact application that I am trying to support is connecting to an
IBM mainframe from random hosts in a routed network via an Attachmate
gateway where calling addresses are mapped into terminal sessions on a 1:1
basis.... Port address translation won't work because all calls appear to
eminate from the single IP address.... I need to do 1:1 NAT but only on a
temporary basis where once a call is complete the NAT address can be used
by another caller...
Clues? Suggestions? Examples?
TIA,
Dave
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-30 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-30 23:43 Is there a way David Sims
2006-04-30 21:15 ` kelly [this message]
2006-05-01 14:50 ` Andy Furniss
2006-05-01 3:45 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-05-02 21:02 ` R. DuFresne
2006-05-03 2:22 ` David Sims
2006-05-02 22:40 ` kelly
2006-05-04 19:40 ` Pascal Hambourg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060430211531.GH23121@Knoppix \
--to=kelly@cliffhanger.com \
--cc=dpsims@dpsims.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox