From: "Thhoep" <thhoep@gmx.de>
To: Ramin Dousti <ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Iproute2 and fwmark usage
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:02:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001501c3d6fc$3a889c80$1684188d@Kiste> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 006501c3d6f7$d96ecf90$1684188d@Kiste
> i just tried over an hour to bring a tunnel up on one of my other servers,
> so i can simulate routing behaviour with it, but just wasted my time with
> trying to fix a broken ppp installation on it. dont have the patience and
> gotten way too tired to do that right now. so i give you the configuration
> of my testing setup and if you would like to reproduce it i would
appreciate
> it.
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth4 -s 192.168.0.22 -j
MARK --set-mark 1
>
damn, forgot the masquerading rule here:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp4 -j MASQUERADE
> ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth4 table test
>
> ip rule add fwmark 1 table test
> OR
> ip rule add from 192.168.0.22 table test
>
> (these ones done in the ppp ip-up script)
>
> ip route add <remote ip> dev <ppp iface> src <local ip>
> ip route add default via <remote ip> dev <ppp iface>
>
> (dont use a default route in the main table to the same ppp iface, so you
> feel a difference when the routing rules apply or not)
>
>
> thats all i think.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-08 23:05 Iproute2 and fwmark usage Thhoep
2004-01-09 16:47 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 16:17 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 17:35 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 16:50 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 19:42 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 19:06 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 20:47 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 20:09 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 21:22 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 21:30 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 22:02 ` Thhoep [this message]
2004-01-11 20:57 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 21:07 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-11 21:50 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 23:12 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 23:22 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-13 23:46 ` Thhoep
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-08 14:20 Filter out broadcast messages Gabby James
2004-01-08 14:31 ` iproute2 and fwmark usage Thhoep
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001501c3d6fc$3a889c80$1684188d@Kiste' \
--to=thhoep@gmx.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).