From: "Thhoep" <thhoep@gmx.de>
To: Ramin Dousti <ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Iproute2 and fwmark usage
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:09:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004101c3d6ec$7801b6b0$1684188d@Kiste> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040109204745.GE24304@cannon.eng.us.uu.net
> Except if it's being dropped by conntrack... And remember, tcpdump sees
stuff
> before the stack does its thing to the packets.
is there a logical reason (besides some bug in the code) why it should drop
something? i thought (but aint sure) that the "demasquerading" happens right
in the prerouting, before the routing process, so that no routing rule in
the world could disturb it?
> An ICMP is not being sent for another ICMP. But I guess an ICMP for ping
> can be sent, though.
.. you made me think with that.. ;) but i've just tested it with http
requests. no icmp errors either.
> You got me there. Try to reduce the complexity of your setup (just bring
> up one ppp, remove the unnecessary tables and so forth) and retest again.
> If the test passes then add little by little to your setup. I'm sure
you'll
> find/locate the problem that way.
i just did it. killed all other ppp connections, there was just eth4 (the
local lan interface), ppp0 and a bunch of non-ip ethernet interfaces. but
the result was the same, and no mis-guided packages in either direction.
i've really no clue what to do now.
i will try to reproduce the configuration on another server here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-08 23:05 Iproute2 and fwmark usage Thhoep
2004-01-09 16:47 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 16:17 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 17:35 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 16:50 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 19:42 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 19:06 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 20:47 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 20:09 ` Thhoep [this message]
2004-01-09 21:22 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-09 21:30 ` Thhoep
2004-01-09 22:02 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 20:57 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 21:07 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-11 21:50 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 23:12 ` Thhoep
2004-01-11 23:22 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-13 23:46 ` Thhoep
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-08 14:20 Filter out broadcast messages Gabby James
2004-01-08 14:31 ` iproute2 and fwmark usage Thhoep
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004101c3d6ec$7801b6b0$1684188d@Kiste' \
--to=thhoep@gmx.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox