* Iptables and bridge
@ 2004-02-17 21:12 Adi
2004-02-17 6:55 ` Stephen Satchell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adi @ 2004-02-17 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 387 bytes --]
Hi,
Does anyone ever try traffic accounting using iptables (ipac-ng) in at linux bridge?
I have try using iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ACCEPT, but when i see the
bytes counter using iptables -t mangle -nL -vx, it shown 0.
But acctually the traffic already flow from eth0,eth1and br0,
i monitoring by the traffic using tcpdump and iptraf.
Thanks
Regards,
Kris
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1226 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Iptables and bridge
2004-02-17 21:12 Iptables and bridge Adi
@ 2004-02-17 6:55 ` Stephen Satchell
2004-02-17 10:18 ` Iptables and SNAT Jan Kaastrup
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Satchell @ 2004-02-17 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adi; +Cc: netfilter
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 13:12, Adi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone ever try traffic accounting using iptables (ipac-ng) in at
> linux bridge?
> I have try using iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ACCEPT, but when
> i see the
> bytes counter using iptables -t mangle -nL -vx, it shown 0.
> But acctually the traffic already flow from eth0,eth1and br0,
> i monitoring by the traffic using tcpdump and iptraf.
Yes. What I do is use accounting when I have blocked a spammer from
using mail to/from the servers behind my layer-2 firewall. Everything
is selected by raw interface in the FILTER section. It's been effective
to demonstrate when a person who has been guilty of spamming before is
possibly starting to spam again.
I haven't played with MANGLE in the layer-2 firewall, but then again my
whole purpose for having one of those beasts is to offload our CISCO
7500 routers and provide some very specific protection for Windows
systems. I run a mostly-closed firewall for them, and ever since I did
that we have had far fewer problems with them.
Satch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Iptables and SNAT
2004-02-17 6:55 ` Stephen Satchell
@ 2004-02-17 10:18 ` Jan Kaastrup
2004-02-17 10:57 ` Mark Vevers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kaastrup @ 2004-02-17 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'netfilter'
Hi list
After a reboot of my RedHat mashine, the NAT part of Iptables stop
working.
I get: "iptables: Invalid argument" when using snat.
My snat rule look like this:
$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $EXT_INT -j SNAT --to-source $EXT_IP
I have made all netfilter stuff as modules.
#lsmod
ip_conntrack_irc 4336 1 (autoclean)
ip_nat_irc 3440 0 (unused)
ip_conntrack_ftp 5520 1 (autoclean)
ip_nat_ftp 4240 0 (unused)
ipt_ah 1080 0 (unused)
ipt_esp 1112 0 (unused)
iptable_nat 22040 2 [ip_nat_irc ip_nat_ftp]
ppp_mppe 24088 0 (autoclean)
bsd_comp 5464 0 (autoclean)
ppp_async 9440 0 (autoclean)
ppp_generic 24508 0 (autoclean) [ppp_mppe bsd_comp
ppp_async]
slhc 6740 0 (autoclean) [ppp_generic]
ipt_LOG 4152 1 (autoclean)
ipt_REJECT 4024 1 (autoclean)
ipt_state 1048 5 (autoclean)
iptable_mangle 2776 0 (autoclean) (unused)
ip_conntrack 28296 4 (autoclean) [ip_conntrack_irc
ip_nat_irc ip_conntrack_ftp ip_nat_ftp iptable_nat ipt_state]
iptable_filter 2412 1 (autoclean)
ip_tables 14872 10 [ipt_ah ipt_esp iptable_nat ipt_LOG
ipt_REJECT ipt_state iptable_mangle iptable_filter]
Any hints???
I have tried to recompile iptables - but nothing seems to work - I know
it did before the reboot.
Only thing that has been changed is a static route being enabled, but
this shouldn't make iptables complain:(
Thanks a lot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Iptables and SNAT
2004-02-17 10:18 ` Iptables and SNAT Jan Kaastrup
@ 2004-02-17 10:57 ` Mark Vevers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Vevers @ 2004-02-17 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kaastrup, 'netfilter'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 17 Feb 2004 10:18 am, Jan Kaastrup wrote:
> Hi list
> After a reboot of my RedHat mashine, the NAT part of Iptables stop
> working.
Is the iptable_nat module loaded?
/sbin/lsmod will list the modules and if any modules are not loaded for
the ruleset then you'll either need to modprobe them beforehand or
alter modules.conf to load them when iptables loads (add below ...)
Cheers
Mark
- --
Mark Vevers. mark@ifl.net / mark@vevers.net
Principal Internet Engineer, Internet for Learning,
Research Machines Plc. (AS5503)
- --
GPG Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB08F3CA3
Fingerprint: 85BA 30C4 9EC8 1792 4C8C C31E 58B5 3D1C B08F 3CA3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAMfOEWLU9HLCPPKMRAu0XAJ9yVLQ0X3x0XNQ84irLTOVdZPrWUACdGr2Y
udGvM/2ukyptia+Vh/+UX6s=
=t6Ag
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-17 21:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-17 21:12 Iptables and bridge Adi
2004-02-17 6:55 ` Stephen Satchell
2004-02-17 10:18 ` Iptables and SNAT Jan Kaastrup
2004-02-17 10:57 ` Mark Vevers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox