* ftos why obsolate
@ 2003-12-16 12:27 CoyoteTM
2003-12-17 14:49 ` libipq Oumer Teyeb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: CoyoteTM @ 2003-12-16 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]
Hello All!
The ftos patch in the patch-o-matic is marked osolate. why ?
I need to match to the TOS filed precedence bit(s).
Thanks
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 726 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* libipq
2003-12-16 12:27 ftos why obsolate CoyoteTM
@ 2003-12-17 14:49 ` Oumer Teyeb
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Oumer Teyeb @ 2003-12-17 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hi,
I have a linux box (propriotry of some company) where there is an
installation of iptables but not of libipq. As I want to do some
userspace programming, I naturally want libipq installed. Is there an
easy way of installing libipq without the need to recompile my kernel (I
don't even have the source for the kernel) or reinstall the iptables
that is already there? Will it be enough just to run make under the
libipq sub-directory of the iptables source code? I just don't want to
mess the iptables that is already working.
Thanks in advance,
Oumer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-17 14:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-16 12:27 ftos why obsolate CoyoteTM
2003-12-17 14:49 ` libipq Oumer Teyeb
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox