From: Daniel Wittenberg <daniel-wittenberg@starken.com>
To: Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Unassigned Networks List
Date: 08 Mar 2003 00:48:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047106127.2050.56.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000701c2e53d$72cc42b0$026410ac@honor>
Just something of interest I ran into the other day with a client. We
moved them to a new building, and setup their new wireless connection,
and for the life of me couldn't ping their provider, but everyone else.
It seems their provider is using 172 and 10.x addresses for their
wireless towers, and gateways to the internet. So if I traceroute to
the client I get public -> public -> private -> private -> private ->
public. It didn't work going out from the client at first because we
drop all reserved addresses on the public NIC of the firewall, so we
couldn't ping the provider. I subsequently got in an "discussion" with
their CTO about RFC 1918 on how it's probably not good to be using
private IP's to route public traffic, at least IMHO.
Dan
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 00:39, Sascha Reissner wrote:
> From: "George J. Jahchan, Eng." <NetFilter-Users@Compucenter.org>
>
> [...]
>
> > As mentioned before, classes A & D networks are fairly well documented on
> > IANA's site <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space>, but B
> and
> > C are listed as "various registries" and in bulk, which is of no help.
> > I need a list of 128~191 and 192~223 netblocks which are either reserved
> or
> > not assigned.
>
> [...]
>
> so you plan on checking currently unassigned ip blocks on a daily base just
> in case some ISP suddenly gets such a block assigned?
>
> well, there are for sure some efford/reward relations that are not worth
> doing.. this is one of them ;)
>
> if you want security, unplug the network cable ;-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-08 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <007201c2e2d7$4c6552f0$e11310ac@techknowledge.ws>
2003-03-08 5:51 ` Unassigned Networks List George J. Jahchan, Eng.
2003-03-08 6:39 ` Sascha Reissner
2003-03-08 6:48 ` Daniel Wittenberg [this message]
2003-03-08 12:03 ` Arnt Karlsen
2003-03-08 14:07 ` Kelly Setzer
2003-03-11 22:33 ` Arnt Karlsen
2003-03-16 17:37 ` nbastin
2003-03-12 21:25 Jason Opperisano
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-05 3:16 George J. Jahchan, Eng.
2003-03-05 14:52 ` Jeremy Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1047106127.2050.56.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com \
--to=daniel-wittenberg@starken.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox