Re: Unassigned Networks List

[Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>]

On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:07:03 -0600, 
Kelly Setzer <Kelly.Setzer@placemark.com> wrote in message 
<20030308140703.GB2652@placemark.com>:

> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 01:03:50PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On 08 Mar 2003 00:48:47 -0600, 
> > Daniel Wittenberg <daniel-wittenberg@starken.com> wrote in message 
> > <1047106127.2050.56.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com>:
> > 
> > > firewall, so we couldn't ping the provider.  I subsequently got in
> > > an"discussion" with their CTO about RFC 1918 on how it's probably
> > > not good to be using private IP's to route public traffic, at
> > > least IMHO.
> > 
> > ..such discussions are better taken in public, so the hotshot can
> > show off his alledged competence...  ;-)
> 
> When @home was just getting off the ground, they used to expose 10/8
> addresses.  I was talking to a first or second level network engineer,
> and he *INSISTED* that 10/8 has been assigned to @home.
> 
> ha

..but he is _right_, even I use it here at _my_ home,  
and, I even have 192.168/16 and 172.16/12.  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.