Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* time modules
@ 2003-03-18  7:17 vlad
  2003-03-23 11:21 ` Fabrice MARIE
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: vlad @ 2003-03-18  7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Hello netfilter,

iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp -s 192.168.1.2/32 -m time --timestart \
11:00 --timestop 17:00 --days Sun,Mon,Tue,Wed,Thu,Fri,Sat \
-d 192.168.1.1/32 --j DROP  
Defaul policy in INPUT chain - DROP
But... packets allows to 192.168.1.240 (server) in this
time --> 11:00-17:00.

Why?

-- 
With best wishes,
 vlad                          mailto:faktadmin@mail.ru

----------------------------------------------



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* time modules
@ 2003-03-18  7:24 netfilter-maillist
  2003-03-18  7:37 ` Raymond Leach
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: netfilter-maillist @ 2003-03-18  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Hello

iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp -s 192.168.1.2/32 -m time --timestart \
11:00 --timestop 17:00 --days Sun,Mon,Tue,Wed,Thu,Fri,Sat \
-d 192.168.1.1/32 --j DROP  
Defaul policy in INPUT chain - DROP
But... packets allows to 192.168.1.240 (server) in this
time --> 11:00-17:00.

Why?

-- 
With best wishes,
 netfilter-maillist                          mailto:vlad@fakt.tazovsky.ru



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: time modules
  2003-03-18  7:24 time modules netfilter-maillist
@ 2003-03-18  7:37 ` Raymond Leach
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Raymond Leach @ 2003-03-18  7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Netfilter Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1281 bytes --]

If you use SNAT (masquerade) then it may be bypassing the input chain
because of a prerouting rule ...

On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 09:24, netfilter-maillist wrote:
> Hello
> 
> iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp -s 192.168.1.2/32 -m time --timestart \
> 11:00 --timestop 17:00 --days Sun,Mon,Tue,Wed,Thu,Fri,Sat \
> -d 192.168.1.1/32 --j DROP  
> Defaul policy in INPUT chain - DROP
> But... packets allows to 192.168.1.240 (server) in this
> time --> 11:00-17:00.
> 
> Why?
-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(  Raymond Leach                       )
 ) Knowledge Factory                  (
(                                      )
 ) Tel: +27 11 445 8100               (
(  Fax: +27 11 445 8101                )
 )                                    (
(  http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za/  )
 ) http://www.saptg.co.za/            (
(  http://www.mapnet.co.za/            )
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   o                                o
    o                              o
        .--.                  .--.
       | o_o|                |o_o |
       | \_:|                |:_/ |
      / /   \\              //   \ \
     ( |     |)            (|     | )
     /`\_   _/'\          /'\_   _/`\
     \___)=(___/          \___)=(___/


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: time modules
  2003-03-18  7:17 vlad
@ 2003-03-23 11:21 ` Fabrice MARIE
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabrice MARIE @ 2003-03-23 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vlad, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org


Hi Vladimir,

On Tuesday 18 March 2003 15:17, vlad wrote:
> Hello netfilter,
> iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp -s 192.168.1.2/32 -m time --timestart \
> 11:00 --timestop 17:00 --days Sun,Mon,Tue,Wed,Thu,Fri,Sat \
> -d 192.168.1.1/32 --j DROP
> Defaul policy in INPUT chain - DROP
> But... packets allows to 192.168.1.240 (server) in this
> time --> 11:00-17:00.
> Why?

With a quick guess, two reasons come to mind:
1- you have an ACCEPT rule that shadows the -m time -j DROP rule,
   therefore nullifying its effect.
2- the packets that you talk about still being allowed might be from
   a forwarding connection ? In which case you have to filter in
   forward chain.

To see if 1 is your problem, simply put the rule -m time -j DROP at
the _begining_ of the ruleset, this way you'll be sure it won't be shadowed
by other rules.

To see if 2 is your problem, simply put the rule -m time -j DROP in
the FORWARD chain instead.

Have a nice day,

Fabrice.
--
Fabrice MARIE

"Silly hacker, root is for administrators"
       -Unknown


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-23 11:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-18  7:24 time modules netfilter-maillist
2003-03-18  7:37 ` Raymond Leach
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-18  7:17 vlad
2003-03-23 11:21 ` Fabrice MARIE

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox