* tcp-window-tracking.patch fails to apply
@ 2003-04-26 9:19 John A. Sullivan III
2003-04-26 10:54 ` Martin Josefsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: John A. Sullivan III @ 2003-04-26 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
I very much wanted to use the window tracking patch but an unable to get
it to apply. I am running RedHat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.20. The
patch-o-matic test replies:
Testing... tcp-window-tracking.patch NOT APPLIED (29 rejects out of 32
hunks)
When I try to apply the patch I get:
Patch extra/tcp-window-tracking.patch conflicts with
extra/ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch...
ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch NOT APPLIED (1 missing files)
Testing patch extra/tcp-window-tracking.patch...
Placed new Makefile line
Failed to patch copy of /usr/src/linux
TEST FAILED: patch NOT applied.
I do not have ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch installed. I even tried
reversing that patch in case it was installed without my knowing it but
it is not there.
I rebuilt the kernel and tried the tcp-window-tracking patch as the only
patch but that didn't work either. I tried applying it separately after
applying all other patches. That didn't work. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks - John
--
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: tcp-window-tracking.patch fails to apply
2003-04-26 9:19 tcp-window-tracking.patch fails to apply John A. Sullivan III
@ 2003-04-26 10:54 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-04-26 12:29 ` John A. Sullivan III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-04-26 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John A. Sullivan III; +Cc: Netfilter
On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 11:19, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> I very much wanted to use the window tracking patch but an unable to get
> it to apply. I am running RedHat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.20. The
> patch-o-matic test replies:
>
> Testing... tcp-window-tracking.patch NOT APPLIED (29 rejects out of 32
> hunks)
>
> When I try to apply the patch I get:
>
> Patch extra/tcp-window-tracking.patch conflicts with
> extra/ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch...
> ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch NOT APPLIED (1 missing files)
> Testing patch extra/tcp-window-tracking.patch...
> Placed new Makefile line
> Failed to patch copy of /usr/src/linux
> TEST FAILED: patch NOT applied.
>
> I do not have ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch installed. I even tried
> reversing that patch in case it was installed without my knowing it but
> it is not there.
>
> I rebuilt the kernel and tried the tcp-window-tracking patch as the only
> patch but that didn't work either. I tried applying it separately after
> applying all other patches. That didn't work. What am I doing wrong?
Did you apply all pending and submitted patches?
./runme --batch pending
will do that and it is required for some patches to apply.
--
/Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: tcp-window-tracking.patch fails to apply
2003-04-26 10:54 ` Martin Josefsson
@ 2003-04-26 12:29 ` John A. Sullivan III
2003-04-26 13:03 ` Martin Josefsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: John A. Sullivan III @ 2003-04-26 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Josefsson, Netfilter
No, I didn't. I suppose I felt intimidated by the warning about not
applying all the patches. Is it safe to apply all the patches, or at
least all the pending and submitted patches? Thanks - John
On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 06:54, Martin Josefsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 11:19, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > I very much wanted to use the window tracking patch but an unable to get
> > it to apply. I am running RedHat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.20. The
> > patch-o-matic test replies:
> >
> > Testing... tcp-window-tracking.patch NOT APPLIED (29 rejects out of 32
> > hunks)
> >
> > When I try to apply the patch I get:
> >
> > Patch extra/tcp-window-tracking.patch conflicts with
> > extra/ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch...
> > ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch NOT APPLIED (1 missing files)
> > Testing patch extra/tcp-window-tracking.patch...
> > Placed new Makefile line
> > Failed to patch copy of /usr/src/linux
> > TEST FAILED: patch NOT applied.
> >
> > I do not have ip_conntrack-timeouts.patch installed. I even tried
> > reversing that patch in case it was installed without my knowing it but
> > it is not there.
> >
> > I rebuilt the kernel and tried the tcp-window-tracking patch as the only
> > patch but that didn't work either. I tried applying it separately after
> > applying all other patches. That didn't work. What am I doing wrong?
>
> Did you apply all pending and submitted patches?
>
> ./runme --batch pending
>
> will do that and it is required for some patches to apply.
--
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: tcp-window-tracking.patch fails to apply
2003-04-26 12:29 ` John A. Sullivan III
@ 2003-04-26 13:03 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-04-28 15:12 ` John A. Sullivan III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-04-26 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John A. Sullivan III; +Cc: Netfilter
On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 14:29, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> No, I didn't. I suppose I felt intimidated by the warning about not
> applying all the patches. Is it safe to apply all the patches, or at
> least all the pending and submitted patches? Thanks - John
The submitted patches are always safe, the pending are the ones that's
on their way into the kenel so they are safe as well.
If you apply all submitted patches the netfilter part of your kernel
will be up to speed with the latest kernel 2.4 development which is a
good thing. It's always recommended that you apply all pending and
submitted patches.
--
/Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: tcp-window-tracking.patch fails to apply
2003-04-26 13:03 ` Martin Josefsson
@ 2003-04-28 15:12 ` John A. Sullivan III
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: John A. Sullivan III @ 2003-04-28 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Josefsson; +Cc: Netfilter
That did the trick. Thank you very much - John
On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 09:03, Martin Josefsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 14:29, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > No, I didn't. I suppose I felt intimidated by the warning about not
> > applying all the patches. Is it safe to apply all the patches, or at
> > least all the pending and submitted patches? Thanks - John
>
> The submitted patches are always safe, the pending are the ones that's
> on their way into the kenel so they are safe as well.
>
> If you apply all submitted patches the netfilter part of your kernel
> will be up to speed with the latest kernel 2.4 development which is a
> good thing. It's always recommended that you apply all pending and
> submitted patches.
--
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-28 15:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-26 9:19 tcp-window-tracking.patch fails to apply John A. Sullivan III
2003-04-26 10:54 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-04-26 12:29 ` John A. Sullivan III
2003-04-26 13:03 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-04-28 15:12 ` John A. Sullivan III
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox