* New rules set would not work until rules where summarized
@ 2003-12-20 14:45 Ted Kaczmarek
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ted Kaczmarek @ 2003-12-20 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Redhat 9
2.4.20-24.9.i686
iptables-1.2.7a-2
I have one setup where I log based upon clients SA's. Each client has
their own prefix they log to.
The rules were very anal in that SA/DA port for each flow was defined. I
tried to add another pair of SA/DA's port rules
and they refused to work. I tried downgrading to 2.4.20-20.9
no joy. In desperation I redid the rules to limit the amount
of individual rules to SA subnet/DA port , applied the ruleset again
summarized that would not work and it is now working.
So now instead of having 40 lines of rules, 20 logging and 20 accept, I
now have have 16, 8 logging and 8 accept and it is behaving.
How could I identify what was the root of the problem?
I would like to recreate the problem and gather more data, but any
insight into what I should be looking fow would be appreciated.
Is their some allocation somehwere in the kernel that is possibly too
small?
Or did I hit some obscure bug?
Thanks and Happy Holidays,
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-12-20 14:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-20 14:45 New rules set would not work until rules where summarized Ted Kaczmarek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox