From: "John A. Sullivan III" <john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com>
To: XXmas@gmx.at
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: AW: bandwidth problems [Linux 2.4.20] [iptables 1.2.7a]
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:49:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1076442585.2018.46.camel@ca.gts.nexusmgmt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200402101943.i1AJhR9M012184@nmibwkms1.nexusmgmt.com>
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 14:43, root@scheuchenstuel.com wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > My configuration:
> > > =================
> > >
> > > O-------------o O-----------------------o
> > > | WinXP | | eth0 | eth1 |
> > > | 10.10.1.100 |----| 10.10.1.254 | D H C P |----INTERNET
> > > | | | | |
> > > O-------------o O-----------------------o
> > > My Computer My NAT-Computer
> > >
> > > NAT-Computer:
> > > Linux 2.4.20-4GB
> > > load average: 0.08, 0.05, 0.06
> > > iptables v1.2.7a
> > > All the NICs I use are 3com 3C905-TX
> > >
> > > When I do some bandwidth tests on the NAT-Computer
> > (provider's service
> > > page) my bandwidth is about 1MBit/second When I do the same on my
> > > computer I only get about 100kbit/second
> > >
> > > Now I wonder if there are any problems with my configuration...?
> > > Would be nice if you could help me...
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > > Florian St.
> > >
> > > Root(AT)scheuchenstuel(DOT)com
> > >
> > >
> > > My iptables-configuration:
> > > ==========================
> > >
> > >
> > ######################################################################
> > > ######
> > > ######
> > >
> > > #!/bin/bash
> > > #
> > >
> > > modprobe iptable_nat
> > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > >
> > > ########## CLEARING TABLES
> > > iptables -F
> > > iptables -t nat -F
> > > iptables -t mangle -F
> > > iptables -X
> > >
> > > ########## SETTING POLICIES
> > > iptables -P INPUT DROP
> > > iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
> > > iptables -P FORWARD DROP
> > >
> > > ########## NAT
> > > iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
> > > ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
> > >
> > > ########## LOOPBACK SETTINGS
> > > iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> > > iptables -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1/32 -j ACCEPT
> > >
> > > ########## EXTERNAL OPEN PORTS
> > > iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
> > >
> > > ########## INTERNAL OPEN PORTS
> > > iptables -A INPUT -s 10.10.1.100/32 -j ACCEPT
> > >
> > > ######### NAT FORWARDING
> > > iptables -A FORWARD -s 10.10.1.100/32 -j ACCEPT iptables -A
> > FORWARD -d
> > > 10.10.1.100/32 -j ACCEPT
> > >
> > >
> > ######################################################################
> > > ######
> > > ######
> >
> > The rules look a little unusual; in fact, they look downright
> > dangerous. You may want to read a good iptables tutorial
> > such as the one by Oskar Andreasson. You can find a link to
> > it on the netfilter.org web site. You can also find some
> > slide shows in the training section at http://iscs.sourceforge.net
> >
> > However, I do not think your rules would create a throughput problem.
> > How are you measuring your throughput?
> > --
> > John A. Sullivan III
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > Nexus Management
> > +1 207-985-7880
> > john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
> > ---
> > If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise
> > class VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please
> > visit http://iscs.sourceforge.net
> >
>
> Now i tried to use a script sufggested by Oskar Andreasson
> http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html#RCFIREWALLTXT
>
> But the problem is still the same...
> I think there is another problem...
>
> When i configure&start squid on the NAT-Computer i have full bandwidth...
>
> I don't know what to do anymore...
>
> Thanks in advance
> Florian St.
How are you measuring your throughput? What happens if you don't use
squid but allow direct (iptables protected) web access from the client?
--
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-10 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200402101943.i1AJhR9M012184@nmibwkms1.nexusmgmt.com>
2004-02-10 19:49 ` John A. Sullivan III [this message]
2004-02-11 10:31 ` AW: AW: bandwidth problems [Linux 2.4.20] [iptables 1.2.7a] root
2004-02-11 15:52 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-02-12 7:16 ` AW: " root
2004-02-12 12:04 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-02-12 22:46 ` AW: " root
2004-02-10 18:01 John A. Sullivan III
2004-02-10 19:43 ` AW: " root
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1076442585.2018.46.camel@ca.gts.nexusmgmt.com \
--to=john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com \
--cc=XXmas@gmx.at \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox