From: "John A. Sullivan III" <john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com>
To: root@scheuchenstuel.com
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: bandwidth problems [Linux 2.4.20] [iptables 1.2.7a]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:52:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1076514759.2012.12.camel@ca.gts.nexusmgmt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040211103119.IVZS2453.viefep20-int.chello.at@ctxroot>
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 05:31, root@scheuchenstuel.com wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > My configuration:
> > > > > =================
> > > > >
> > > > > O-------------o O-----------------------o
> > > > > | WinXP | | eth0 | eth1 |
> > > > > | 10.10.1.100 |----| 10.10.1.254 | D H C P |----INTERNET
> > > > > | | | | |
> > > > > O-------------o O-----------------------o
> > > > > My Computer My NAT-Computer
> > > > >
> > > > > NAT-Computer:
> > > > > Linux 2.4.20-4GB
> > > > > load average: 0.08, 0.05, 0.06
> > > > > iptables v1.2.7a
> > > > > All the NICs I use are 3com 3C905-TX
> > > > >
> > > > > When I do some bandwidth tests on the NAT-Computer
> > > > (provider's service
> > > > > page) my bandwidth is about 1MBit/second When I do the
> > same on my
> > > > > computer I only get about 100kbit/second
> > > > >
> > > > > Now I wonder if there are any problems with my configuration...?
> > > > > Would be nice if you could help me...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance
> > > > > Florian St.
> > > > >
> > > > > Root(AT)scheuchenstuel(DOT)com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > My iptables-configuration:
> > > > > ==========================
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > ####################################################################
> > > > ##
> > > > > ######
> > > > > ######
> > > > >
> > > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > > #
> > > > >
> > > > > modprobe iptable_nat
> > > > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > > > >
> > > > > ########## CLEARING TABLES
> > > > > iptables -F
> > > > > iptables -t nat -F
> > > > > iptables -t mangle -F
> > > > > iptables -X
> > > > >
> > > > > ########## SETTING POLICIES
> > > > > iptables -P INPUT DROP
> > > > > iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
> > > > > iptables -P FORWARD DROP
> > > > >
> > > > > ########## NAT
> > > > > iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -m state --state
> > ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
> > > > > ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
> > > > >
> > > > > ########## LOOPBACK SETTINGS
> > > > > iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> > > > > iptables -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1/32 -j ACCEPT
> > > > >
> > > > > ########## EXTERNAL OPEN PORTS
> > > > > iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
> > > > >
> > > > > ########## INTERNAL OPEN PORTS
> > > > > iptables -A INPUT -s 10.10.1.100/32 -j ACCEPT
> > > > >
> > > > > ######### NAT FORWARDING
> > > > > iptables -A FORWARD -s 10.10.1.100/32 -j ACCEPT iptables -A
> > > > FORWARD -d
> > > > > 10.10.1.100/32 -j ACCEPT
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > ####################################################################
> > > > ##
> > > > > ######
> > > > > ######
> > > >
> > > > The rules look a little unusual; in fact, they look downright
> > > > dangerous. You may want to read a good iptables tutorial such as
> > > > the one by Oskar Andreasson. You can find a link to it on the
> > > > netfilter.org web site. You can also find some slide
> > shows in the
> > > > training section at http://iscs.sourceforge.net
> > > >
> > > > However, I do not think your rules would create a
> > throughput problem.
> > > > How are you measuring your throughput?
> > > > --
> > > > John A. Sullivan III
> > > > Chief Technology Officer
> > > > Nexus Management
> > > > +1 207-985-7880
> > > > john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Now i tried to use a script suggested by Oskar Andreasson
> > >
> > http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html#RCFIREWA
> > > LLTXT
> > >
> > > But the problem is still the same...
> > > I think there is another problem...
> > >
> > > When i configure&start squid on the NAT-Computer i have
> > full bandwidth...
> > >
> > > I don't know what to do anymore...
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > > Florian St.
> > How are you measuring your throughput? What happens if you
> > don't use squid but allow direct (iptables protected) web
> > access from the client?
> > --
> > John A. Sullivan III
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > Nexus Management
> > +1 207-985-7880
> > john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
> > ---
>
> I use the bandwidth test-page of my provider...
> http://performance.chello.at:81
>
> What do you mean with "direct" web access ?
> Web access via NAT ?
> I have entered the NAT-computer's IP as default gateway
> and the provider's DNS-servers as DNS-servers on my PC.
> I think this is what you mean with direct access...
>
> With this direct access i only get about 100kbit, when i use
> squid or when i do the tests on the NAT-computer i have full
> Bandwidth (around 1MBit/sec)
>
> I think there is a general problem with my configuration,
> because the bandwidth is no better with iptables-scripts
> which are known to work fine...
>
> I really don't know what to do anymore...
>
> Thanks in advance
> Florian St.
As I look at it, unless you have significantly altered your scripts, you
are probably not using Squid. I see no rule to redirect your web traffic
to Squid. What happens if you disable Squid?
--
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-11 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200402101943.i1AJhR9M012184@nmibwkms1.nexusmgmt.com>
2004-02-10 19:49 ` AW: bandwidth problems [Linux 2.4.20] [iptables 1.2.7a] John A. Sullivan III
2004-02-11 10:31 ` AW: " root
2004-02-11 15:52 ` John A. Sullivan III [this message]
2004-02-12 7:16 ` AW: " root
2004-02-12 12:04 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-02-12 22:46 ` AW: " root
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1076514759.2012.12.camel@ca.gts.nexusmgmt.com \
--to=john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=root@scheuchenstuel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox