Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Udo Rader <udo.rader@bestsolution.at>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: mysterious dropped echo replies
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:50:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1117612238.27138.17.camel@athene.bestsolution.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050601022233.GA6992@bender.817west.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1717 bytes --]

Hmm, the packages were obviously RETURNed by the line mentioned to the
global root "catch all" rule and thats exactly what should normally
happen.

In the end I neither want the packages to be dropped nor rejected but
returned instead for the inspection by other chains, but I will only
switch back to RETURN after if I've found the origin for the echo
replies.

So for now, I am quite happy with both DROP and REJECT, thanks :-)

Udo Rader

BestSolution.at GmbH
http://www.bestsolution.at

On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 22:22 -0400, Jason Opperisano wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 06:21:44PM +0300, Sertys wrote:
> > Well , this line :
> > iptables -t nat -A Cid3D99741E.0   -d 192.168.100.0/24 -j RETURN
> > 
> > change it to -j DROP and it wont generate any replies. -j RETURN, returns  
> > the packet and sends and icmp message to the src!
> 
> RETURN returns the packet to the calling chain, or enforces the
> root chain's POLICY if there is no calling chain to return to.
> your description matches what REJECT does, not RETURN.
> 
> -j
> 
> --
> "Stewie: Damn the toilet. It's made slaves of you all. It just
>  sits there consuming other people's feces while contributing nothing
>  of its own to society."
>         --Family Guy
-- 
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t                        EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
udo rader              technischer leiter/CEM   mobile  ++43 660 5263642
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 8/3    A-6020 innsbruck      fax      ++43 512 935833
http://www.bestsolution.at                      phone    ++43 512 935834

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-01  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-31  8:42 mysterious dropped echo replies Udo Rader
2005-05-31  9:09 ` Sertys
2005-05-31  9:16   ` Sertys
2005-05-31 11:33     ` Udo Rader
2005-05-31 11:40       ` Sertys
2005-05-31 16:58         ` Udo Rader
2005-05-31 18:38           ` Clemente Aguiar
2005-06-01  2:22         ` Jason Opperisano
2005-06-01  7:50           ` Udo Rader [this message]
2005-06-01  8:43           ` Sertys

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1117612238.27138.17.camel@athene.bestsolution.at \
    --to=udo.rader@bestsolution.at \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox