Fwd: Newbie Q: Forcing p2p traffic via one interface on a dual homed system.

[hArTh0 hArTh0 <harth0@gmail.com>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: hArTh0 hArTh0 <harth0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:05:32 +0200
Subject: Re: Newbie Q: Forcing p2p traffic via one interface on a dual
homed system.
To: Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com>


Hmmm I see what you mean.

I guess the ipp2p module is normally used to prioritise traffic rather
than re-route it.

Could some one suggest an appropriate general strategy that I could
use solve my original problem i.e. selectively force p2p traffic to
traverse ppp1?

Regards,


H

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:33:46 -0500, Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 15:38, hArTh0 hArTh0 wrote:
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My first post to this group and be warned I am a new linux user ;)
> >
> > My setup:
> >
> > -----ISP1---ppp0----Router-----MainPC
> > -----ISP2---ppp1-------|
> >
> > Router ip: 192.168.0.1
> > MainPC ip: 192.168.0.10
> > ppp0: 165.165.89.171
> > ppp1: 165.146.132.124
> >
> > What I want to achieve is that all p2p traffic passes through ppp1
> > while everthing else goes through ppp0.
> >
> > My approach to date: Use http://www.ipp2p.org to mark all p2p packets
> > and then attempt to use this mark to get these packets to leave via
> > ppp1.
>
> your question sounds just like:
>
>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter&m=109853391328421&w=2
>
> answer is still the same:
>
>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter&m=109866874632386&w=2
>
> -j
>
> --
> "Me lose brain? Uh, oh! Ha ha ha! Why I laugh?"
>         --The Simpsons
>
>