Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marian Stagarescu <marian@ti.com>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: "Martin Josefsson" <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>,
	"Cédric Rivard" <cedric@yemanja.net>,
	Netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
	Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ???
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:02:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210021002.01553.marian@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021002153013.A13233@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>

On Wednesday 02 October 2002 09:30 am, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Marian Stagarescu wrote:
> > i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack:
> >
> > run it with debug on: works
> > run it w/out debug on: does not.
>
> what do you call 'debug' ?  Does this mean the DEBUG #defines in the
> respective sourcecode .c files

yes. ip_conntrack_pptp.c, ip_nat_pptp.c, ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c, 
ip_nat_proto_gre.c are compiled with DEBUGP defined.

> or are you talking about
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG?

i have this turned on as well

> > this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in
> > ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245:
> >
> > DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg]
> >                      ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid));
>
> What happens?  Does the kernel oops at this statement?

no opps but the PPTP session is not established.

I'll come back with a detailed debug log.


> > thanks for any input,
> > marian


      reply	other threads:[~2002-10-02 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-20  9:11 PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic) Cédric Rivard
2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson
2002-09-25 20:48   ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu
2002-09-25 20:56     ` Marian Stagarescu
2002-10-02 13:30     ` Harald Welte
2002-10-02 14:02       ` Marian Stagarescu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200210021002.01553.marian@ti.com \
    --to=marian@ti.com \
    --cc=cedric@yemanja.net \
    --cc=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
    --cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox