From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Cc: Netfilter Mailinglist <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:28:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040225182828.GP13386@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1498 bytes --]
Hi!
I've been trying to finish patch-o-matic-ng during the last week. At
least for 2.6.x kernels (specifically: 2.6.3) it seems to work just
fine. It doesn't offer you any patches that are incompatible with 2.6
or have not yet been ported.
However, more testing is definitely needed before an official release.
This is where you come in :) If you want to help, please grab the
latest patch-o-matic-ng, either from CVS or as snapshot. Do some
testing, especially with 2.4.x kernels.
If you end up in any strange behaviour (like .rej rejects in the kernel
tree, patches that apply cleanly but don't compile, patches that apply
and compile cleanly but crash the machine, ...) - please report it back
to the netfilter-devel mailinglist.
btw: It might be advisable to use ftp/www mirrors like
ftp.hu.netfilter.org / www.hu.netfilter.org , since tomorrow is a
scheduled downtime of the main netfilter site.
Thanks,
Harald.
p.s.: Yes, the nf_log patch does currently not apply against 2.6.x.
This is know, and not really a bug since it fails gracefully. Somebody
just needs to updat it.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 18:28 Harald Welte [this message]
2004-02-25 19:31 ` [ANNOUNCE] call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng rruegner
2004-02-25 20:28 ` Harald Welte
2004-02-26 16:00 ` RRuegner
2004-02-26 20:24 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-02-26 20:31 ` RRuegner
2004-02-26 20:28 ` call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng tested with kernel 2.4.25 failed for h323 RRuegner
2004-02-29 10:11 ` [ANNOUNCE] call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng Willy TARREAU
2004-02-29 10:25 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-02-29 13:33 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040225182828.GP13386@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
--to=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox