From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: Willy TARREAU <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Mailinglist <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:33:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040229133308.GO7790@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040229101116.GA10012@pcw.home.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1968 bytes --]
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:11:16AM +0100, Willy TARREAU wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> Just tested it on top of 2.4.25, like this :
>
> KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux-2.4.25-pomng ./runme --batch extra
>
> and I got a few problems :
>
> - first, I didn't find how to specify where my iptables sources is
> installed, so I had to enter it by hand each time I restarted it.
> I did not find any env variable in the perl code, and I must say
> that my understanding of perl is, hmmm.. very limited.
I've now introduced the IPTABLES_DIR environment variable (or the
--iptables-path option)
> - ROUTE and TRACE told me :
> "unable to find ladd slot in src /usr/src/linux-2.4.25-pomng/./net/ipv6/Makefile"
> I think they wanted to add a line in the Makefile but didn't find
> the right place to do so.
Yes, indeed. They were in the wrong directory, should be fixed now.
> BTW, is there a way to install a patch only for ipv4 or for ipv6 like before ?
no.
> - I observed usual conflicts :
> present 'CONNMARK' conflicts with to-be-installed 'connbytes'
> present 'raw' conflicts with to-be-installed 'conntrack-seqfile'
> present 'CONNMARK' conflicts with to-be-installed 'conntrack_arefcount'
yes, that is normal and perfectly ok.
> - and finally, trying to apply conntrack_locking litterally killed my
> box in out of memory within a few tens of seconds (I could not even
> run ps) :
ouch. That needs to be fixed. I'll try to reproduce that.
> Cheers,
> Willy
Thanks for your testing so far.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-29 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 18:28 [ANNOUNCE] call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng Harald Welte
2004-02-25 19:31 ` rruegner
2004-02-25 20:28 ` Harald Welte
2004-02-26 16:00 ` RRuegner
2004-02-26 20:24 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-02-26 20:31 ` RRuegner
2004-02-26 20:28 ` call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng tested with kernel 2.4.25 failed for h323 RRuegner
2004-02-29 10:11 ` [ANNOUNCE] call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng Willy TARREAU
2004-02-29 10:25 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-02-29 13:33 ` Harald Welte [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040229133308.GO7790@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
--to=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox