patch-o-matic

patch-o-matic

[Ilya Kostin]

Hello netfilter,

  patch-o-matic or iptables-1.2.9 ???

-- 
Best regards,
 Ilya                          mailto:adm@samnipineft.ru

Re: patch-o-matic

[Gavin Hamill]

On Tuesday 30 March 2004 09:39, Ilya Kostin wrote:
> Hello netfilter,
>
>   patch-o-matic or iptables-1.2.9 ???

Yes.

Cheers,
Gavin.
P.S. If you send an obtuse question, you will get an obtuse answer.

Re: patch-o-matic

[Antony Stone]

On Tuesday 30 March 2004 9:42 am, Gavin Hamill wrote:

> On Tuesday 30 March 2004 09:39, Ilya Kostin wrote:
> > Hello netfilter,
> >
> >   patch-o-matic or iptables-1.2.9 ???
>
> Yes.
>
> Cheers,
> Gavin.
> P.S. If you send an obtuse question, you will get an obtuse answer.

I was going to reply "Apache, or possibly squid", however you beat me to it :)

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all the evidence that you tried.

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.

patch-o-matic

[Jorge I. Davila L.]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 227 bytes --]

Hi list!:

I'm trying to apply some patches from the patch-o-matic repository but
following the instructions I can't connect to the cvs repository ...
where are patches ??

Best regards,

-- 
Jorge Isaac Davila Lopez

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: patch-o-matic

[Scott]

CVS is no more, they use SubVersioN now:
http://netfilter.org/downloads.html#svn

--- "Jorge I. Davila L." <davila@cablenet.com.ni>
wrote:

> Hi list!:
> 
> I'm trying to apply some patches from the
> patch-o-matic repository but
> following the instructions I can't connect to the
> cvs repository ...
> where are patches ??
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> -- 
> Jorge Isaac Davila Lopez
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: patch-o-matic

[Jorge I. Davila L.]

Thanks ..

El mié, 05-10-2005 a las 17:55 -0700, Scott escribió:
> CVS is no more, they use SubVersioN now:
> http://netfilter.org/downloads.html#svn
> 
> --- "Jorge I. Davila L." <davila@cablenet.com.ni>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi list!:
> > 
> > I'm trying to apply some patches from the
> > patch-o-matic repository but
> > following the instructions I can't connect to the
> > cvs repository ...
> > where are patches ??
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jorge Isaac Davila Lopez
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
-- 
Jorge Isaac Davila Lopez

patch-o-matic

[Ilya Kostin]

Hello netfilter,

   patch-o-matic or release iptables-1.2.9 ????

-- 
Best regards,
 Ilya                          mailto:adm@samnipineft.ru

Re: patch-o-matic

[Antony Stone]

On Tuesday 30 March 2004 9:28 am, Ilya Kostin wrote:

> Hello netfilter,
>
>    patch-o-matic or release iptables-1.2.9 ????

Strawberry or vanilla?

What is your *question*?

What are you trying to *do*?

What is the *problem* you have?

If you don't tell us enough to know what you want, we can't tell you how to 
achieve it.

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it,
we'd be so simple that we couldn't.

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.

RE: Patch-o-matic

[Rob Sterenborg]

> get a latest copy of iptables with it's patch-o-matic
> version, I am never able to patch the newnat stuff including
> the H323 patches..
>
> What is missing???
>
> I'm on (soon to be running, patching atm) Linux 2.4.19 with
> iptables 1.2.7a and it's patch-o-matic version....
>
> I get this every damn time....
>
> Testing... z-newnat16.patch NOT APPLIED (106 rejects out of 110 hunks)

<snip>

> what the hell is going on!?

Don't know ; it works for me, but..

I once had a problem patching the kernel which made me do a make menuconfig
(or make xconfig or make config, whatever). I configured nothing and saved
the "changes", after which patching worked.

Another solution could be the following ; I read somewhere sometime that you
might have to patch the kernel twice before some patch can be applied.

Maybe this helps ?..


Rob

Patch-o-matic

[George Vieira]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1841 bytes --]

Man!!!!! ,
 
I am sick of patch-o-matic and it's patches.. no matter how many times I
upgrade my kernel (even a fresh copy) and time get a latest copy of iptables
with it's patch-o-matic version, I am never able to patch the newnat stuff
including the H323 patches..
 
What is missing???
 
I'm on (soon to be running, patching atm) Linux 2.4.19 with iptables 1.2.7a
and it's patch-o-matic version....
 
I get this every damn time....
 
Testing... z-newnat16.patch NOT APPLIED (106 rejects out of 110 hunks)
The submitted/z-newnat16 patch:
   Status: Submitted for 2.4.20-pre1
   Implementation of the new nat API for kernel 2.4.19-pre4 and above.
   - enables us to have multiple related expectations
   (necessarry for H.323, real IRC and PPTP tracking, ...)
   - allows expectations to have timeouts
   - adds full SACK support to the NAT code (we no longer strip
   SACKPERM option out of all SYN patckes for ftp/irc connections)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/v/q/?] y
Testing patch submitted/z-newnat16.patch...
Failed to patch copy of /usr/src/linux
TEST FAILED: patch NOT applied.
 
[Press enter to continue]
 
 
H323 Patch gets this (obviously coz it needs newnat16)... Grrr!!!
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/v/q/?] y
Testing patch extra/h323-conntrack-nat.patch...
   Placed new Config.in line
   Placed new Config.in line
   Placed new Configure.help entry
   Placed new Makefile line
Could not find place to slot in ip_conntrack.h line
Could not find place to slot in ip_conntrack.h line
Could not find place to slot in ip_conntrack.h line
TEST FAILED: patch NOT applied.
 
[Press enter to continue]
 
 
what the hell is going on!?
 
Thanks,
 
George VIeira
 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4568 bytes --]

Patch-O-matic

[Red Hat Enigma]

Dear friends
I still try to find a way to use patch-o-matic features on my kernel ( 
2.4.18 ) ,when I run make patch-o-matic ,many patches say, applying patch 
fail and I don't know why, I do the following steps :

make pending-patches
make most-of-pom
make patch-o-matic
< compiling the kernel>
make KERNEL_DIR

but many patches didn't apply .

Regards
Alireza

RE: Patch-O-matic

[Aldo S. Lagana]

Fellers corect me if I'm wrong, but the P-O-M features are not to be ALL
used simultaneously - it even says it during the patch process that some
patches break other patches...

SO

If you need the functionality found in a specific or a few patches - go
ahead and apply only those patches, otherwise you always seem to get
that _ out of _ failed chunks error...



> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org 
> [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Red Hat Enigma
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:52 PM
> To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Patch-O-matic
> 
> 
> Dear friends
> I still try to find a way to use patch-o-matic features on my 
> kernel ( 
> 2.4.18 ) ,when I run make patch-o-matic ,many patches say, 
> applying patch 
> fail and I don't know why, I do the following steps :
> 
> make pending-patches
> make most-of-pom
> make patch-o-matic
> < compiling the kernel>
> make KERNEL_DIR
> 
> but many patches didn't apply .
> 
> Regards
> Alireza
> 
> 

Re: Patch-O-matic

[Redhat Enigma]

Dear Sir,
Thanx for your help ,I just want to use iplimit and time matching, but I
can't apply them to my kernel.
Anyway I just want to apply pending-patches and most-of-pom that the
documents tell they don't have any confilict with each other. So I don't
know what kind of process i should follow.

Regards
Alireza
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aldo S. Lagana" <alagana@discmail.com>
To: "'Red Hat Enigma'" <redhat@zagros.ipm.ac.ir>;
<netfilter@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:40 AM
Subject: RE: Patch-O-matic


> Fellers corect me if I'm wrong, but the P-O-M features are not to be ALL
> used simultaneously - it even says it during the patch process that some
> patches break other patches...
>
> SO
>
> If you need the functionality found in a specific or a few patches - go
> ahead and apply only those patches, otherwise you always seem to get
> that _ out of _ failed chunks error...
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org
> > [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Red Hat Enigma
> > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:52 PM
> > To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
> > Subject: Patch-O-matic
> >
> >
> > Dear friends
> > I still try to find a way to use patch-o-matic features on my
> > kernel (
> > 2.4.18 ) ,when I run make patch-o-matic ,many patches say,
> > applying patch
> > fail and I don't know why, I do the following steps :
> >
> > make pending-patches
> > make most-of-pom
> > make patch-o-matic
> > < compiling the kernel>
> > make KERNEL_DIR
> >
> > but many patches didn't apply .
> >
> > Regards
> > Alireza
> >
> >
>

RE: Patch-O-matic

[Aldo S. Lagana]

I have kernel 2.4.16 and iptables 1.2.5...

I tested your 2 pathces (limit and time) and they patched without any
errors on my system.  I am not sure if there is an issue with your
kernel version or your iptables version...anybody?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Redhat Enigma [mailto:redhat@zagros.ipm.ac.ir] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:10 AM
> To: Aldo S. Lagana; netfilter@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: Patch-O-matic
> 
> 
> Dear Sir,
> Thanx for your help ,I just want to use iplimit and time 
> matching, but I can't apply them to my kernel. Anyway I just 
> want to apply pending-patches and most-of-pom that the 
> documents tell they don't have any confilict with each other. 
> So I don't know what kind of process i should follow.
> 
> Regards
> Alireza

Re: Patch-O-matic

[Fabrice MARIE]

On Tuesday 09 July 2002 15:09, Redhat Enigma wrote:
> Dear Sir,
> Thanx for your help ,I just want to use iplimit and time matching, but I
> can't apply them to my kernel.
> Anyway I just want to apply pending-patches and most-of-pom that the
> documents tell they don't have any confilict with each other. So I don't
> know what kind of process i should follow.

Hello,

basically, all patches contained in pending/ submitted & base/ in p-o-m should apply without
conflict. Maybe you didn't follow the appropriate steps ?
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO.html

Have a nice day,

Fabrice.
--
Fabrice MARIE
Senior R&D Engineer
Celestix Networks
http://www.celestix.com/

"Silly hacker, root is for administrators"
       -Unknown

Re: Patch-O-matic

[Alireza]

Hi,
I really follow all the steps in the following howto, but patch-o-matic.
prompt
FAIL copy /usr/src/linux-2.4.18-5 and doesn't apply the patch (ip-limit) and
som other that I applied to kernel version 2.4.2.
When I checked my kernel directory I saw all the required files copied there
for example iplimit.h and netlink.c was pathced but it doesn't add a line in
/usr/src/linux-2.4/net/ipv4/netfilter/Config.in .

I don't know about the errors.

Regards
Alireza
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fabrice MARIE" <fabrice@celestix.com>
To: "Redhat Enigma" <redhat@zagros.ipm.ac.ir>; "Aldo S. Lagana"
<alagana@discmail.com>; "Denis JULIEN" <denis.julien@vupublishing.net>;
"iptables" <netfilter@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: Patch-O-matic


> On Tuesday 09 July 2002 15:09, Redhat Enigma wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
> > Thanx for your help ,I just want to use iplimit and time matching, but I
> > can't apply them to my kernel.
> > Anyway I just want to apply pending-patches and most-of-pom that the
> > documents tell they don't have any confilict with each other. So I don't
> > know what kind of process i should follow.
>
> Hello,
>
> basically, all patches contained in pending/ submitted & base/ in p-o-m
should apply without
> conflict. Maybe you didn't follow the appropriate steps ?
>
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO.html
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Fabrice.
> --
> Fabrice MARIE
> Senior R&D Engineer
> Celestix Networks
> http://www.celestix.com/
>
> "Silly hacker, root is for administrators"
>        -Unknown