Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Ip accounting Help
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:41:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406231241.29378.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1087988244.2036.60.camel@joel.d2visp.com>

On Wednesday 23 June 2004 11:57 am, Joel wrote:

> On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 14:31, Antony Stone wrote:
> >
> > Beware of trying to do this if you are using the stateful connection
> > tracking of netfilter (iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state
> > ESTABLISHED,RELATED), because if you are, then almost all of the packets
> > going through the machine (specifically, all except the first one of each
> > connection) will be processed by this one rule, and all the other rules
> > in the FORWARD chain will only see one packet per connection (the first
> > one).
> >
> > You may be able to do what you want using the mangle table of the FORWARD
> > chain, but not with the default filter table.
>
> Yes I am using stateful connection tracking of netfilter ( iptables -I
> FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED)
> So as per you i have used FORWARD chain in MANGLE table like this.
>
> # iptables -t mangle -i eth1 -A FORWARD -s 10.1.1.24/29 -j ACCEPT  ---> I
> think for Download traffic  ---> M I right ?
> # iptables -t mangle -i eth0 -A FORWARD -d 10.1.1.24/29 -j ACCEPT  ---> I
> think for Upload traffic ----> M I right ?
>
> This is the output of 
> # iptables -t mangle -nvL FORWARD
>
> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 1747K packets, 318M bytes)
>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source             
> destination
> 1068 91499 ACCEPT     all  --  eth1   *       10.1.1.24/29         0.0.0.0/0
>  148 26923 ACCEPT     all  --  eth0   *       0.0.0.0/0           
> 10.1.1.24/29
>
> Antony i have lot of other ip address but i have created only this subnet
> for mangle table for testing.
> Traffic bytes are passing through this.
> So is the correct method ?
> Will be the bytes over here are accurate ???

The byte counts will be accurate, yes, and you have the correct idea about 
using -s a.b.c.d and -d w.x.y.z to capture traffic to and from particular IP 
addresses.

The thing I suggest you change, though, is not to have a -j ACCEPT at the end 
of your rules - just let all the packets flow right through the mangle table, 
with the rules simply counting them as they go past.

In other words, don't do:

iptables -t mangle -i eth1 -A FORWARD -s 10.1.1.24/29 -j ACCEPT

Just do:

iptables -t mangle -i eth1 -A FORWARD -s 10.1.1.24/29

The packets will still get counted just the same.

The reason for this advice is that the filter table is for filtering; the nat 
and mangle tables are not.   Therefore you shouldn't use targets like ACCEPT, 
DROP, etc (which are filtering operations) anywhere except the filter tables.

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
I want to build a machine that will be proud of me.

 - Danny Hillis, creator of The Connection Machine

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-23 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-23  3:49 Ip accounting Help Joel
2004-06-23  9:01 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-23 10:57   ` Joel
2004-06-23 11:41     ` Antony Stone [this message]
2004-06-24  3:29       ` Joel Solanki
2004-06-25 11:27       ` Joel Solanki
2004-06-26  4:30       ` Ip accounting Help--> Urgent Joel Solanki
2004-06-26  8:22         ` Antony Stone
2004-06-26  8:33           ` Askar Ali Khan
2004-06-26  9:20           ` Joel Solanki
2004-06-26  9:29             ` Antony Stone
2004-06-26  9:55               ` Joel Solanki
2004-06-26 10:23               ` Joel Solanki
2004-06-26 11:16                 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-26 11:40                   ` Joel Solanki
2004-06-23  9:16 ` Ip accounting Help Dharmendra T.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200406231241.29378.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
    --to=antony@soft-solutions.co.uk \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox