* Ipv6 array ORDER
@ 2004-07-19 14:28 Alpt
2004-07-19 14:39 ` Antony Stone
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alpt @ 2004-07-19 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 483 bytes --]
Hi there,
What's the ipv6 array ORDER in the in6_addr struct?
In other words what's the word order of "__u32 u6_addr32[4];" ?
Is it "most significant word first" or "least significant first"?
And each word is in network byte order right?
Thanks ;)
--
:wq!
"I don't know nothing" The One Who reached the Thinking Matter '.'
[ Alpt --- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ GPG Key ID 441CF0EE ]
[ Key fingerprint = 8B02 26E8 831A 7BB9 81A9 5277 BFF8 037E 441C F0EE ]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Ipv6 array ORDER
2004-07-19 14:28 Ipv6 array ORDER Alpt
@ 2004-07-19 14:39 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-19 15:20 ` Alpt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2004-07-19 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
On Monday 19 July 2004 3:28 pm, Alpt wrote:
> Hi there,
> What's the ipv6 array ORDER in the in6_addr struct?
> In other words what's the word order of "__u32 u6_addr32[4];" ?
> Is it "most significant word first" or "least significant first"?
>
> And each word is in network byte order right?
This sort of question is probably better suited to the netfilter developers'
mailing list rather than the netfilter users' list. Somebody here might
know, but I wouldn't bet on it. Somebody on the developers' list really
should know.
Regards,
Antony.
--
"When you talk about Linux versus Windows, you're talking about which
operating system is the best value for money and fit for purpose. That's a
very basic decision customers can make if they have the information available
to them. Quite frankly if we lose to Linux because our customers say it's
better value for money, tough luck for us."
- Steve Vamos, MD of Microsoft Australia
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Ipv6 array ORDER
2004-07-19 14:39 ` Antony Stone
@ 2004-07-19 15:20 ` Alpt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alpt @ 2004-07-19 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 671 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:39:15PM +0100, Antony Stone after a spiritual call wrote :
~> This sort of question is probably better suited to the netfilter developers'
~> mailing list rather than the netfilter users' list. Somebody here might
~> know, but I wouldn't bet on it. Somebody on the developers' list really
~> should know.
I'm very sorry. I made a mistake while pasting the email. I wanted to
send it to linux-net.
Sorry again.
--
:wq!
"I don't know nothing" The One Who reached the Thinking Matter '.'
[ Alpt --- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ GPG Key ID 441CF0EE ]
[ Key fingerprint = 8B02 26E8 831A 7BB9 81A9 5277 BFF8 037E 441C F0EE ]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-19 15:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-19 14:28 Ipv6 array ORDER Alpt
2004-07-19 14:39 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-19 15:20 ` Alpt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox