Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: ddos / no connection tracking / tarpitting
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 00:32:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050422043222.GA2461@bender.817west.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F417A02D74275560AA714548B2D0@phx.gbl>

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:19:43PM -0700, Vic N wrote:
> A while ago I saw an iptables solution that was able to serve as an 
> effective anti-ddos solution.   I didn't get to see under the hood, but the 
> creator told me that the solution was essentially an iptables 
> implementation with no connection tracking built in.  Allegedly, the fact 
> that no connection tracking was used enabled the the iptables to deal with 
> a much higher volume of traffic w/o crashing.  He had also mentioned using 
> packet counting (to count packets as they passed through since there was no 
> way to keep track of them otherwise) and using tarpitting.
> 
> While I can't attest to what the person told me, I do know the firewall was 
> soaking up ddos traffic that was otherwise bringing servers to their knees 
> with the use of regular connection-based firewalling.
> 
> So my question is, is this the basic element of building a good anti-ddos 
> solution wtih iptables to address a *large* volume of ddos traffic to build 
> iptables w/o connection tracking?

that...or installing openbsd.

-j

--
"Psychiatrist: Does Stewie have a history of violence?
 Lois: Oh no, this is Stewie's first violent act.
 Stewie: Actually, my first violent act involved that ticking time bomb
 that I left in your uterus when I left. Happy 50th Birthday, Lois."
        --Family Guy


  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-22  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-22  4:19 ddos / no connection tracking / tarpitting Vic N
2005-04-22  4:32 ` Jason Opperisano [this message]
2005-04-22  4:45   ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22  5:01     ` Jason Opperisano
2005-04-22  5:22 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22  6:50   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-04-22  6:52     ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 21:13   ` R. DuFresne
2005-04-22 22:12     ` Seferovic Edvin
     [not found]     ` <42697714.011dd32f.69e7.219fSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
2005-04-22 22:18       ` Fabien Germain
2005-04-22 22:28     ` Taylor, Grant
2005-04-22 23:05     ` Daniel Lopes
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-22  7:01 Gary W. Smith
2005-04-22  7:05 Gary W. Smith
2005-04-22  7:10 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22  7:32 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050422043222.GA2461@bender.817west.com \
    --to=opie@817west.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox