From: Daniel Lopes <lopsch@lopsch.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: ddos / no connection tracking / tarpitting
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:05:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42698350.1060400@lopsch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0504221707050.15167@darkstar.sysinfo.com>
R. DuFresne schrieb:
>
> the only way to really survive a ddos without affecting connectivity in
> any shapoe or form is to have a bigger pipe then the other end<s> does.
> idiots trying to ddos from a cable connection or dialup are not a
> problem and sufferable. Those a tad higher in technical advancement
> with a bot net and tousands of zomies to attack from are likely to bring
> even the biggest pipes to a dead halt, at least getting in and our of
> the firewall gateway is impossible. Traffic on the inside should be
> unaffected.
>
> I've suffered attacks with a firewall not doing connection tracking and
> had no problems with either the firewall failing or suffereing a reboot.
> I have yet to suffer such an attack on a staeful firewall, but tend to
> think I should suffer no less with such a firewall in place as apposed
> to an the older mere packet filters I've been replacing over time.
> Course, it helps to have enough RAM in the firewall in the firstplace...
>
> pipes size and RAM, them be the keys to surviival.
>
> Thanks,
>
That´s the point. With professional DDoS attacks we are talking about
people using their botnets and zombies and in total they can reach a
bandwidth beyond the Gbit border. Not really easy to handle such packet
storm ;).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-22 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-22 4:19 ddos / no connection tracking / tarpitting Vic N
2005-04-22 4:32 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-04-22 4:45 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 5:01 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-04-22 5:22 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 6:50 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-04-22 6:52 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 21:13 ` R. DuFresne
2005-04-22 22:12 ` Seferovic Edvin
[not found] ` <42697714.011dd32f.69e7.219fSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
2005-04-22 22:18 ` Fabien Germain
2005-04-22 22:28 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-04-22 23:05 ` Daniel Lopes [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-22 7:01 Gary W. Smith
2005-04-22 7:05 Gary W. Smith
2005-04-22 7:10 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 7:32 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42698350.1060400@lopsch.com \
--to=lopsch@lopsch.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox