Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Schlich <lists@wolfram.schlich.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pageexec@freemail.hu
Subject: Re: PaX killing conntrackd (strange "execution attempt")
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:09:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081117130924.GD26975@bla.fasel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49216734.9080505@netfilter.org>

* Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> [2008-11-17 13:29]:
> pageexec@freemail.hu wrote:
>> [...]
>> so that's a null function pointer in whatever structure __build_protoinfo 
>> dereferences
>> there. is it of any help to you or do you need me to dig out more?
>
> Hm, that code belongs to libnetfilter_conntrack (src/conntrack/build.c). 
> The annoying thing is that I see no structure with function pointers in 
> that piece of bits. There are only calls to libnfnetlink functions to build 
> the netlink message that is sent to kernel-space.
>
> @Wolfram: that code is only reachable during a fail-over - ie. when the 
> external cache commits the entries or if you have CacheWriteThrough enabled 
> (you shouldn't unless you know what you're doing). I'm telling this because 
> otherwise I don't see a way to reach that code - considering the posibility 
> of having a memory corruption so that this backtrace becomes useless.

Hmm. There was definitely no fail-over at that time and I didn't
enable CacheWriteThrough either.
But I got a second coredump from the second firewall machine which
I already sent to the PaX team -- maybe the analysis of that one
shows different results. I guess we should wait for this one before
thinking about possible causes.

@PaX team: did you already have time to look at the second coredump?
-- 
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-17 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-13 10:03 PaX killing conntrackd (strange "execution attempt") Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-13 13:27 ` Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-13 14:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-11-13 16:01     ` Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-13 17:41   ` Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-13 20:10     ` Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-14 12:03       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-11-14 15:09         ` Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-14 14:36           ` pageexec
2008-11-17 12:44             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-11-17 13:09               ` Wolfram Schlich [this message]
2008-11-17 12:57                 ` pageexec
2008-11-20 11:48               ` pageexec
2008-11-23 14:07                 ` Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-23 14:24                 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-11-23 14:29                   ` Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-23 14:36                     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-11-23 22:03                   ` pageexec
2008-11-24 13:28                     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-11-14 15:54           ` Wolfram Schlich
2008-11-14 16:18             ` Wolfram Schlich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081117130924.GD26975@bla.fasel.org \
    --to=lists@wolfram.schlich.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox