Re: PaX killing conntrackd (strange "execution attempt")

[Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>]

Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> Here's the answer from the PaX team, for those who might be interested:
> 
> * pageexec@freemail.hu <pageexec@freemail.hu> [2008-11-13 14:18]:
>> On 13 Nov 2008 at 11:03, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
>>> --8<--
>>> 2008-11-13 07:38:34 +01:00; hafw2; kern.notice; kernel: ip4t_FW DENY_IN: IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX SRC=XX.XXX.XX.XX DST=XX.XX.XXX.X LEN=48 TO
>>> S=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=118 ID=23801 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=2608 DPT=21 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
>>> 2008-11-13 07:38:34 +01:00; hafw2; kern.err; kernel: PAX: execution attempt in: <NULL>, 00000000-00000000 00000000
>>> 2008-11-13 07:38:34 +01:00; hafw2; kern.err; kernel: PAX: terminating task: /usr/sbin/conntrackd(conntrackd):6562, uid/euid: 0/0, PC: 0000000000000000, SP: 0000797077f7ea48
>>> 2008-11-13 07:38:34 +01:00; hafw2; kern.err; kernel: PAX: bytes at PC: ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
>>> 2008-11-13 07:38:34 +01:00; hafw2; kern.err; kernel: PAX: bytes at SP-8:
>>> 2008-11-13 07:38:34 +01:00; hafw2; kern.alert; kernel: grsec: denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0 for /usr/sbin/conntrackd[conntrackd:
>>> 6562] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0, parent /sbin/init[init:1] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0
>>> --8<--
>>>
>>> The log messages look somewhat strange, especially the 'NULL',
>>> '000..' and '??' parts :) I've always only seen such messages
>>> with a more meaningful content so far, thus I'm a bit confused.
>>>
>>> What might be the reason for that?
>> this is a null function pointer dereference problem on the surface and you'll have to
>> debug it to get more info. i wonder why nothing shows up in the stack dump however,
>> maybe there's more corruption here behind the scenes. once you get the coredumps (and
>> i hope you have debug info saved away ;) we can get a backtrace and other things. also
>> disable randomization in /proc/sys/... so that results are comparable. best would be
>> to find a way to directly trigger this crash, then you could have a live gdb session
>> instead of coredump analysis.
> 
> I'll take care of these suggestions now and let you know
> about any news.

Thank you. BTW, what version of conntrackd is triggering this problem?
Is it latest 0.9.8?

-- 
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers