* passing data transparently
@ 2012-02-26 18:03 Payal
2012-02-26 18:36 ` Thomas Bätzler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Payal @ 2012-02-26 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hi all,
I am helping a friend with this setup. They have a device which has a
fixed ip (say 1.2.3.4) which talks with its software running on
MS-Windows which must be physically connected to it and must have a
specific IP (say 1.2.3.5) only. Now it happens that the laptop running
that software is in a branch office so physical connection is not
possible. So, we have thought of,
Device(1.2.3.4)<-->(1.2.3.5)Linux(ext add.)<-->INTERNET<-->(ext.
add.)Linux2(1.2.3.4)<-->(1.2.3.5)MS-Win Laptop
The idea is that the laptop thinks it is dealing with device and the
device thinks that it is dealing with laptop, while both of them are
dealing with a black box (Linux) which is transparently passing the
data.
Is this model right or can we make it better? I am unable to figure out
the exact routing (and iptables) part. Can someone help in this? Do we
need ip or route will be sufficent? Or is there any software which will
pass data transparently like nc or xinetd does for a specific port?
Thanks in advance.
With warm regards,
Payal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: passing data transparently
2012-02-26 18:03 passing data transparently Payal
@ 2012-02-26 18:36 ` Thomas Bätzler
2012-02-26 18:57 ` Payal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bätzler @ 2012-02-26 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter; +Cc: Payal
Am 26.02.2012 19:03, schrieb Payal:
> Hi all,
> I am helping a friend with this setup. They have a device which has a
> fixed ip (say 1.2.3.4) which talks with its software running on
> MS-Windows which must be physically connected to it and must have a
> specific IP (say 1.2.3.5) only. Now it happens that the laptop running
> that software is in a branch office so physical connection is not
> possible. So, we have thought of,
>
> Device(1.2.3.4)<-->(1.2.3.5)Linux(ext add.)<-->INTERNET<-->(ext.
> add.)Linux2(1.2.3.4)<-->(1.2.3.5)MS-Win Laptop
>
Have you thought about using a site-to-site ethernet bridge over an
OpenVPN tunnel?
It also helps to protect your privacy with regard to the data passend
netween laptop and device.
See
http://www.openvpn.net/index.php/open-source/documentation/miscellaneous/76-ethernet-bridging.html
for a starting point.
HTH,
Thomas
MfG,
Thomas Bätzler
--
BRINGE Informationstechnik GmbH
Zur Seeplatte 12
D-76228 Karlsruhe
Germany
Fon: +49 721 94246-0
Fon: +49 171 5438457
Fax: +49 721 94246-66
Web: http://www.bringe.de/
Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Martin Bringe
Ust.Id: DE812936645, HRB 108943 Mannheim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: passing data transparently
2012-02-26 18:36 ` Thomas Bätzler
@ 2012-02-26 18:57 ` Payal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Payal @ 2012-02-26 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 07:36:06PM +0100, Thomas Bätzler wrote:
> Have you thought about using a site-to-site ethernet bridge over an OpenVPN
> tunnel?
For starters openvpn might be an overkill. It might make the problem
more complex. Any easy solution?
Thanks a lot.
Payal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-26 18:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-26 18:03 passing data transparently Payal
2012-02-26 18:36 ` Thomas Bätzler
2012-02-26 18:57 ` Payal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox