* Legacy? [not found] <f40a0638-af78-c356-eef4-116b84e652c4.ref@att.net> @ 2021-06-21 22:24 ` slow_speed 2021-06-21 22:30 ` Legacy? Florian Westphal 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: slow_speed @ 2021-06-21 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netfilter A particular computer does not have nftables. It shows rules for iptables and a different set of rules for iptables-legacy. Why is iptables-legacy active but not the plain iptables? Does legacy override the regular? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Legacy? 2021-06-21 22:24 ` Legacy? slow_speed @ 2021-06-21 22:30 ` Florian Westphal 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Florian Westphal @ 2021-06-21 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: slow_speed; +Cc: netfilter slow_speed@att.net <slow_speed@att.net> wrote: > A particular computer does not have nftables. It shows rules for iptables > and a different set of rules for iptables-legacy. Why is iptables-legacy > active but not the plain iptables? Does legacy override the regular? iptables -v will probably tell that its nf_tables. As for why iptables-legacy is involved: either some program calls iptables-legacy instead of iptables or a program uses the raw setsockopt interface. systemd is known to do this when built with libiptc support. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-21 22:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <f40a0638-af78-c356-eef4-116b84e652c4.ref@att.net>
2021-06-21 22:24 ` Legacy? slow_speed
2021-06-21 22:30 ` Legacy? Florian Westphal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox